Abstract:Purpose: The imaging performance and dose of a mobile CT scanner (Brainlab Airo®, Munich, Germany) is evaluated, with particular consideration to assessment of technique protocols for image-guided brachytherapy. Method: Dose measurements were performed using a 100-mm-length pencil chamber at the center and periphery of 16- and 32-cm-diameter CTDI phantoms. Hounsfield unit (HU) accuracy and linearity were assessed using materials of specified electron density (Gammex RMI, Madison, WI), and image uniformity, noise, and noise-power spectrum (NPS) were evaluated in a 20-cm-diameter water phantom as well as an American College of Radiology (ACR) CT accreditation phantom (Model 464, Sun Nuclear, Melbourne, FL). Spatial resolution (modulation transfer function, MTF) was assessed with an edge-spread phantom and visually assessed with respect to line-pair patterns in the ACR phantom and in structures of interest in anthropomorphic phantoms. Images were also obtained on a diagnostic CT scanner (Big Bore CT simulator, Philips, Amsterdam, Netherlands) for qualitative and quantitative comparison. The manufacturer's metal artifact reduction (MAR) algorithm was assessed in an anthropomorphic body phantom containing surgical instrumentation. Performance in application to brachytherapy was assessed with a set of anthropomorphic brachytherapy phantoms - for example, a vaginal cylinder and interstitial ring and tandem. Result: Nominal dose for helical and axial modes, respectively, was 56.4 and 78.9 mGy for the head protocol and 17.8 and 24.9 mGy for the body protocol. A high degree of HU accuracy and linearity was observed for both axial and helical scan modes. Image nonuniformity (e.g., cupping artifact) in the transverse (x,y) plane was less than 5 HU, but stitching artifacts (~5 HU) in the longitudinal (z) direction were observed in axial scan mode. Helical and axial modes demonstrated comparable spatial resolution of ~5 lp/cm, with the MTF reduced to 10% at ~0.38 mm-1 . Contrast-to-noise ratio was suitable to soft-tissue visualization (e.g., fat and muscle), but windmill artifacts were observed in helical mode in relation to high-frequency bone and metal. The MAR algorithm provided modest improvement to image quality. Overall, image quality appeared suitable to relevant clinical tasks in intracavitary and interstitial (e.g., gynecological) brachytherapy, including visualization of soft-tissue structures in proximity to the applicators. Conclusion: The technical assessment highlighted key characteristics of dose and imaging performance pertinent to incorporation of the mobile CT scanner in clinical procedures, helping to inform clinical deployment and technique protocol selection in brachytherapy. For this and other possible applications, the work helps to identify protocols that could reduce radiation dose and/or improve image quality. The work also identified areas for future improvement, including reduction of stitching, windmill, and metal artifacts.

Image quality evaluation of a new high-performance ring-gantry cone-beam computed tomography imager

ACR benchmark testing of a novel high‐speed ring‐gantry linac kV‐CBCT system

Image quality characterization of an ultra‐high‐speed kilovoltage cone‐beam computed tomography imaging system on an O‐ring linear accelerator

Evaluation of a Metal Artifact Reduction Algorithm for Image Reconstruction on a Novel CBCT Platform

Task-based image quality assessment of an intraoperative CBCT for spine surgery compared with conventional CT

Evaluation of image quality of a novel computed tomography metal artifact management technique on an anthropomorphic head and neck phantom

Evaluation of gantry speed on image quality and imaging dose for 4D cone-beam CT acquisition

Quantitative analysis of the image quality in megavoltage cone-beam computed tomography

Technical note: Phantom-based evaluation of CBCT dose calculation accuracy for use in adaptive radiotherapy

Objective image quality assurance in cone‐beam CT: Test methods, analysis, and workflow in longitudinal studies

A Phantom Study Comparing Low-Dose CT Physical Image Quality from Five Different CT Scanners

SU-GG-I-17: Comparison of Different Onboard CT Techniques for Image Guided Radiation Therapy (IGRT)

Evaluation of a compact cone beam CT concept with high image fidelity for point-of-care brain imaging

Methods to Evaluate the Performance of Kilovoltage Cone-Beam Computed Tomography in the Three-Dimensional Reconstruction Space

Virtual monochromatic images for coronary artery imaging with a spectral photon-counting CT in comparison to dual-layer CT systems: a phantom and a preliminary human study

TU‐E‐110‐04: Tetrahedron Beam Computed Tomography

Quantitative Evaluation of Image Quality of Megavoltage Computed Tomography for Guiding Helical Tomotherapy

High-Resolution Head CTA: A Prospective Patient Study Comparing Image Quality of Photon-Counting Detector CT and Energy-Integrating Detector CT

A novel image-domain-based cone-beam computed tomography enhancement algorithm.

The added value of a new high-performance ring-gantry CBCT imaging system for prostate cancer patients

Technical assessment of a mobile CT scanner for image-guided brachytherapy