Feasibility of the 100kvp Coronary CTA

赵凯,姜原,郭小超,胡娟,邱建星,王霄英
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-0313.2013.05.005
2013-01-01
Abstract:Objective:To study the image quality and radiation dose of 100kVp and 400mA CT imaging in patients undergoing coronary CT angiography(CCTA).Methods:From september to december of 2011,One hundred and one patients suspected of coronary artery disease were scanned by 64-slice spiral CT with retrospectively ECG-gated reconstruct scan mode,whose body weight was less than 80kg.They were divided into 100kVp group(n=65) and 120kVp group(n=36).The patients in 100kVp group were scanned with 100kVp and ECG modulation tube current(peak current 400mA),while 120kVp group were scanned with 120kVp and ECG modulation tube current(peak current 500mA).Contrast medium injection rate and volume were personalized by patients' weight(370mg I/mL,mean 40mL).CT image raw data sets were reconstructed with ASIR composite at 30%.The effective radiation dose(ED) and size specific dose estimate(SSDE) of each patient were calculated.CT attenuation of the main vessels(proximal ascending aorta,LM,LAD,LCX,RCA,PDA) were measured and the image quality(noise,CNR,SNR) were estimated.Subjective evaluation was assessed by an experienced radiologist.Results:The mean CT attenuation of the measured vessels in 100kVp group was significantly higher than that in 120kVp group(P0.001).Patients in 100kVp group suffered an average effective radiation dose which was obviously lower than that in 120kVp group(5.65mSv vs 12.66mSv,P0.001),with about 55.34% of reduction.As for the SSDE,the decline was 57.8%(29.68mGy vs 70.34mGy,P0.001).Measured image noise was higher and calculated SNR and CNR in proximal ascending aorta were lower in 100kVp compared with 120kVp.There was no statistically significant difference in subjective image quality between the two groups(P=0.505).Conclusion:To those whose body weights are less than 80kg,CCTA performed by 100kVp may obtain the diagnostic image quality with a reduction of more than half of the radiation dose.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?