Abstract:Rationale and Objectives To assess the feasibility of 70-kVp high-pitch non–ECG-gated thoracic aortic computed tomography angiography (CTA) with 40-mL contrast agent compared to 100-kVp standard-pitch CTA with 60-mL contrast agent. Materials and Methods Sixty-seven patients (51 men and 16 women; mean age, 55 ± 14 years) received non–ECG-gated aortic CTA at 70 kVp, high pitch of 3.4, and 40-mL contrast agent (group A, n = 31) or CTA at 100-kVp, pitch of 1.2, and 60-mL contrast agent (group B, n = 36). Iterative reconstruction was used in all patients. For image quality assessment, CTA images were evaluated on a three-point scale and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were calculated and compared. Furthermore, computed tomography (CT) dose index was recorded. Results Mean CT values and noise levels were higher in group A compared to group B (all P < .001), whereas SNR and CNR were lower than those in group B (all P < .001). Furthermore, the image quality of the aorta at the level of the diaphragm was lower in group A than that in group B (P < .05). However, image quality was graded as diagnostic in all patients, and motion artifacts of the aortic arch were significantly decreased in group A (P <.05). Interreader agreement was good or excellent for image quality assessment (k = 0.625–0.835). The 70-kVp CTA protocol, which allows dose reduction of 85%, was considered diagnostic in all instances by two readers. Conclusions Our proposed thoracic aortic CTA protocol provides diagnostic information with substantial reduction of both radiation and contrast agent doses compared to standard-pitch CTA at 100 kVp. To assess the feasibility of 70-kVp high-pitch non–ECG-gated thoracic aortic computed tomography angiography (CTA) with 40-mL contrast agent compared to 100-kVp standard-pitch CTA with 60-mL contrast agent. Sixty-seven patients (51 men and 16 women; mean age, 55 ± 14 years) received non–ECG-gated aortic CTA at 70 kVp, high pitch of 3.4, and 40-mL contrast agent (group A, n = 31) or CTA at 100-kVp, pitch of 1.2, and 60-mL contrast agent (group B, n = 36). Iterative reconstruction was used in all patients. For image quality assessment, CTA images were evaluated on a three-point scale and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were calculated and compared. Furthermore, computed tomography (CT) dose index was recorded. Mean CT values and noise levels were higher in group A compared to group B (all P < .001), whereas SNR and CNR were lower than those in group B (all P < .001). Furthermore, the image quality of the aorta at the level of the diaphragm was lower in group A than that in group B (P < .05). However, image quality was graded as diagnostic in all patients, and motion artifacts of the aortic arch were significantly decreased in group A (P <.05). Interreader agreement was good or excellent for image quality assessment (k = 0.625–0.835). The 70-kVp CTA protocol, which allows dose reduction of 85%, was considered diagnostic in all instances by two readers. Our proposed thoracic aortic CTA protocol provides diagnostic information with substantial reduction of both radiation and contrast agent doses compared to standard-pitch CTA at 100 kVp.

Prospectively ECG-triggered high-pitch coronary CT angiography at 70 kVp with 30 mL contrast agent: An intraindividual comparison with sequential scanning at 120 kVp with 60 mL contrast agent

Image quality and dose performance of 80 kV low dose scan protocol in high-pitch spiral coronary CT angiography: feasibility study

Clinical effectiveness of contrast medium injection protocols for 80-kV coronary and craniocervical CT angiography—a prospective multicenter observational study

High-pitch coronary CT angiography at 70 kVp with low contrast medium volume: comparison of 80 and 100 kVp high-pitch protocols.

High-Pitch Coronary CT Angiography at 70 Kvp with Low Contrast Medium Volume

Image quality, radiation dose, and diagnostic accuracy of prospectively ECG-triggered high-pitch coronary CT angiography at 70 kVp in a clinical setting: comparison with invasive coronary angiography

Prospectively ECG-triggered High-Pitch 80 Kvp Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography with 30 Ml of 270 Mg I/mL Contrast Material and Iterative Reconstruction.

The Feasibility of Coronary CT Angiography Using a Tube Voltage of 70kvp and 30ml of Contrast Material

Feasibility of Prospectively ECG-triggered High-Pitch Coronary CT Angiography with 30 Ml Iodinated Contrast Agent at 70 Kvp: Initial Experience

Body mass index-adapted tube voltage prospectively ECG-triggered high-pitch coronary CT angiography

Seventy-Peak Kilovoltage High-Pitch Thoracic Aortic CT Angiography without ECG Gating: Evaluation of Image Quality and Radiation Dose.

Seventy–Peak Kilovoltage High-Pitch Thoracic Aortic CT Angiography Without ECG Gating

Image Quality in a Low Radiation Exposure Protocol for Retrospectively ECG-Gated Coronary CT Angiography

Non-Electrocardiogram-Triggered 70-kVp High-Pitch Computed Tomography Angiography of the Whole Aorta With Iterative Reconstruction: Initial Results.

Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography at Low Concentration of Contrast Agent and Low Tube Voltage in Patients with Obesity:: A Feasibility Study

Feasibility of the 100kvp Coronary CTA

Contrast medium administration with a body surface area protocol in step-and-shoot coronary computed tomography angiography with dual-source scanners

High-pitch computed tomography pulmonary angiography with iterative reconstruction at 80 kVp and 20 mL contrast agent volume

Preliminary study on ultra low tube voltage (70kV)sequential scan with low-volume contrast media protocol for dual-source CT coronary angiography

Application of Low Tube Voltage, Low-concentration Contrast Agent Using a 320-row CT in Coronary CT Angiography: Evaluation of Image Quality, Radiation Dose and Iodine Intake

Comparative Study of Prospective and Retrospective Electrocardiogram Gated Dual-Source Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography