Abstract:The current products are TOPCon cell, which is more suitable for bifacial solar cell with the highest theoretical limiting efficiency of 27.62%, and SHJ and PERC cells, with theoretical limiting efficiency of 26.91% and 26.42%, respectively. The next‐generation products may be heterojunction back‐contact (HBC) and TOPCon back‐contact (TBC) cells with high theoretical limiting efficiency of 28.12% and 27.99%, respectively. Currently, the efficiency of p‐type passivated emitter and rear contact (PERC) cells has been growing at an absolute efficiency of 0.5% per year and has reached 23%–23.5% in mass production while getting closer to its theoretical efficiency limit. n‐Type tunnel oxide passivated contact (TOPCon) and silicon heterojunction (SHJ) cells with their superior "passivating selective contacts" technology were the most interesting photovoltaics (PV) technology in the industry. The effect of different passivated contact layers with respect to their influence on the J0, J0,metal, ρc, and the carrier selectivity (S10) and the loss analysis and efficiency potential of industrial‐type PERC, TOPCon, and SHJ solar cells were studied and compared. The results showed that TOPCon structure with a high passivation performance and good optical performance is more suitable for bifacial solar cell and the highest theoretical limiting efficiency with metal shading on the n‐type Si wafer (ηb,e,h,m,max) can be achieved to 27.62%. Although SHJ structure with the highest passivation performance but the worst optical performance owing to the parasitic absorption of a‐Si:H layer and high contact resistivity, the value of ηb,e,h,m,max is 0.7% lower than that of TOPCon solar cells. PERC structure has superior optical performance than SHJ structure, but due to poor passivation performance, the ηb,e,h,m,max is only 26.42%. The next‐generation products may be heterojunction back‐contact (HBC) and TOPCon back‐contact (TBC) cells with high ηb,e,h,m,max of 28.12% and 27.99%, respectively. Exploiting a perfect passivation of the noncontact area, the wide process window and low cost are required and transferring these new concepts to industrial solar cell production will be the next major challenge.

22.13% Efficient Industrial P-Type Mono Perc Solar Cell

Numerical study of mono-crystalline silicon solar cells with passivated emitter and rear contact configuration for the efficiency beyond 24% based on mass production technology

Industrial TOPCon solar cells on n-type quasi-mono Si wafers with efficiencies above 23%

Industrial Silicon Solar Cells Applying the Passivated Emitter and Rear Cell (PERC) Concept—A Review

Improved Bifacial Properties of P‐Type Passivated Emitter and Rear Cell Solar Cells toward High Mass Production Efficiency

Characterization of 23-percent efficient silicon solar cells

Passivated Emitter and Rear Cell Silicon Solar Cells with a Front Polysilicon Passivating Contacted Selective Emitter

Bifacial p-Type PERC Solar Cell with Efficiency over 22% Using Laser Doped Selective Emitter

TOPerc solar cell: An integral approach of TOPCon and PERC architectures for achieving efficiency beyond 25%

Approaching 23% with large‐area monoPoly cells using screen‐printed and fired rear passivating contacts fabricated by inline PECVD

24.58% total area efficiency of screen-printed, large area industrial silicon solar cells with the tunnel oxide passivated contacts (i-TOPCon) design

Mass production of industrial tunnel oxide passivated contacts (i‐TOPCon) silicon solar cells with average efficiency over 23% and modules over 345 W

22.8% efficient ion implanted PERC solar cell with a roadmap to achieve 23.5% efficiency: A process and device simulation study

Electrical Performance, Loss Analysis, and Efficiency Potential of Industrial‐Type PERC, TOPCon, and SHJ Solar Cells: A Comparative Study

High-Efficiency Silicon Inverted Pyramid-Based Passivated Emitter and Rear Cells

Optimization of Controllable Factors in the Aluminum Silicon Eutectic Paste and Rear Silicon Nitride Mono-Passivation Layer of PERC Solar Cells

Evolutionary PERC+ solar cell efficiency projection towards 24% evaluating shadow-mask-deposited poly-Si fingers below the Ag front contact as next improvement step

Industry related approaches for bifacial p-type PERX solar cells

n-Type polysilicon passivating contact for industrial bifacial n-type solar cells

Pathway towards 24% efficiency for fully screen-printed passivated emitter and rear contact solar cells

Fully screen-printed bifacial large area 22.6% N-type Si solar cell with lightly doped ion-implanted boron emitter and tunnel oxide passivated rear contact