Abstract:Nanoparticles with size in the range from 10 nm to 300 nm and from three different materials (Au 10 nm, Ag 20 nm, and PSL 30 nm, 100 nm and 300 nm) were used in this supplementary comparison. The selected nanoparticles meet the requirements of different measurement methods such as Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM), Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM), Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM), Dynamic Light Scattering (DLS), and Differential Mobility Analyzer (DMA), Small Angle X-Ray Scattering and for forth. All 37 participating laboratories returned results, but not all laboratories were able to perform measurement of all 5 nanoparticles. In order to determine the degree of equivalence (DOE), two reference values were considered in this comparison: the method dependent reference value (MRV) and the global reference value (GRV). The MRVs were determined for different measurement methods according to the corresponding reported uncertainties and measurement values from the participants. Each measurement method owns its own MRV. Since the measurement data from DLS were very different from and inconsistent with the measurement data from the other methods, the MRV for DLS was used in the En number calculation for the measurement data reported from the DLS method. The GRV was determined from the MRVs and their uncertainties of all the measurement methods except DLS, and was applied in the En number calculations for the measurement data reported from AFM, EM, DMA and SAXS methods. The assumption that the particles are spherical was commonly made in the nanoparticle measurements. Non-sphericity of particles, if exists, could have different impacts on different measurement methods. It is also important to note that the methods used are measuring mean diameters of a population of particles, not just a single particle, and that the meaning of the mean diameter could differ for different methods. Probably if participants include a different specific contribution in the uncertainty in a harmonized way, taking the non-cancelled method-dependent "systematic" errors into account, it may be easier to compare the results. KEY WORDS FOR SEARCH Nanoparticles; Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM); Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM); Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM); Dynamic Light Scattering (DLS); and Differential Mobility Analyzer (DMA); Small Angle X-Ray Scattering Main text To reach the main text of this paper, click on Final Report . Note that this text is that which appears in Appendix B of the BIPM key comparison database kcdb.bipm.org/ . The final report has been peer-reviewed and approved for publication by the CCL, according to the provisions of the CIPM Mutual Recognition Arrangement (CIPM MRA).

Comparison of Three Conventional Measurements of Ultrafine- particle Diameter

Comparison and research of grain size measurement of ultrafine powder

Nanoparticle Characterization - Supplementary Comparison on Nanoparticle Size

Measurement of 100 nm monodisperse particles by four Accurate methods: Traceability and uncertainty

Measurement Results Comparison Between Laser Particle Analyzer and Sieving Method in Particle Size Distribution

Comparison of Measurement Results of Several Online Carbonaceous Aerosol Monitoring Techniques

A statistic comparison of multi-element analysis of low atmospheric fine particles (PM2.5) using different spectroscopy techniques

Factors That Govern Sub-3 Nm Particle Measurements in an Airmodus® PSM and a TSI® DEG–SMPS

Comparative Study of Three Types of Light Scattering Aerosol Monitor

Comparison of Particle Size Distributions Measured Using Different Techniques

Review of Online Measurement Techniques for Chemical Composition of Atmospheric Clusters and Sub-20 Nm Particles

Methodology for Measurement of Submicron Metallic Wire's Local Electrical Conductivity by Applying Four-points AFM Probe Technique

Design and Research of In-process Particle Size Measurer

An intercomparison study of four different techniques for measuring the chemical composition of nanoparticles

A Simple Optical Aerosol Sensing Method of Sauter Mean Diameter for Particulate Matter Monitoring

A New Angular Light Scattering Measurement of Particulate Matter Mass Concentration for Homogeneous Spherical Particles

Influence of Particle Properties and Environmental Factors on the Performance of Typical Particle Monitors and Low-Cost Particle Sensors in the Market of China

Interlaboratory comparison of nanoparticle size measurements between NMIJ and NIST using two different types of dynamic light scattering instruments

Measurement of the mean aspect ratio and two characteristic dimensions of polydisperse arbitrary shaped nanoparticles, using translational-rotational ultrafast image-based dynamic light scattering

Analyzing dust particle size and size distribution on extracted particles by SEM and comparing with light scattering techniques

An Overview of Particulate Matter Measurement Instruments