Comparative Study of Three Types of Light Scattering Aerosol Monitor

邓芙蓉,王欣,吴少伟,郭新彪
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16241/j.cnki.1001-5914.2009.06.008
2009-01-01
Journal of environmental health
Abstract:Objective To compare the results of three different types of fine particulate matter laser light scattering aerosol monitors and to explore the influencing factors.Methods Three types of Aerosol Monitor A, B, and C were used to monitor the mass concentration of indoor PM2.5 at the same time and place and the membrane weighing method was used at the same time.In order to explore the possible impacts of temperature and humidity indoor on the results of monitoring, a simultaneous monitoring on the temperature and humidity indoor was conducted.The sampling continued 2 days and with 23 hours per day.Results The results of PM2.5 monitored by the three types of aerosol monitors had a good consistency(r were 0.965, 0.988, and 0.984 respectively), but there was significant difference among them(P0.01).The 24-hour average concentration of PM2.5 monitored by A, B and C monitor were(43.83±16.64),(64.76±29.24) and(27.13±12.17) μg/m3 and the result by the membrane weighing method was 50.12 μg/m3.The Aerosol Monitor type B had the highest result, C had the lowest, and A had a result which was most close to the result of the membrane weighing method.There were no obvious correlations between the PM2.5 results and the temperature or humidity indoor.Conclusion The results of measurements by the three different types of aerosol monitors were different and the temperature and humidity were not the major factors that may impact the monitoring results of PM2.5.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?