Abstract:Abstract. Mobility particle size spectrometers often referred to as DMPS (Differential Mobility Particle Sizers) or SMPS (Scanning Mobility Particle Sizers) have found a wide range of applications in atmospheric aerosol research. However, comparability of measurements conducted world-wide is hampered by lack of generally accepted technical standards and guidelines with respect to the instrumental set-up, measurement mode, data evaluation as well as quality control. Technical standards were developed for a minimum requirement of mobility size spectrometry to perform long-term atmospheric aerosol measurements. Technical recommendations include continuous monitoring of flow rates, temperature, pressure, and relative humidity for the sheath and sample air in the differential mobility analyzer. We compared commercial and custom-made inversion routines to calculate the particle number size distributions from the measured electrical mobility distribution. All inversion routines are comparable within few per cent uncertainty for a given set of raw data. Furthermore, this work summarizes the results from several instrument intercomparison workshops conducted within the European infrastructure project EUSAAR (European Supersites for Atmospheric Aerosol Research) and ACTRIS (Aerosols, Clouds, and Trace gases Research InfraStructure Network) to determine present uncertainties especially of custom-built mobility particle size spectrometers. Under controlled laboratory conditions, the particle number size distributions from 20 to 200 nm determined by mobility particle size spectrometers of different design are within an uncertainty range of around ±10% after correcting internal particle losses, while below and above this size range the discrepancies increased. For particles larger than 200 nm, the uncertainty range increased to 30%, which could not be explained. The network reference mobility spectrometers with identical design agreed within ±4% in the peak particle number concentration when all settings were done carefully. The consistency of these reference instruments to the total particle number concentration was demonstrated to be less than 5%. Additionally, a new data structure for particle number size distributions was introduced to store and disseminate the data at EMEP (European Monitoring and Evaluation Program). This structure contains three levels: raw data, processed data, and final particle size distributions. Importantly, we recommend reporting raw measurements including all relevant instrument parameters as well as a complete documentation on all data transformation and correction steps. These technical and data structure standards aim to enhance the quality of long-term size distribution measurements, their comparability between different networks and sites, and their transparency and traceability back to raw data.

Measurement of 100 nm monodisperse particles by four Accurate methods: Traceability and uncertainty

Size and Time-Resolved Growth Rate Measurements of 1 to 5 Nm Freshly Formed Atmospheric Nuclei

Online Nanoparticle Mass Measurement by Combined Aerosol Particle Mass Analyzer and Differential Mobility Analyzer: Comparison of Theory and Measurements

Nanoparticle Characterization - Supplementary Comparison on Nanoparticle Size

Nano-hygroscopicity Tandem Differential Mobility Analyzer (Nano-Htdma) for Investigating Hygroscopic Properties of Sub-10Nm Aerosol Nanoparticles

Analysis of Measurement Techniques to Determine Dry Deposition Velocities of Aerosol Particles with Diameters Less Than 100 Nm

Evaluation of Uncertainty in Nanoparticle Size Measurement by Electro-gravitational Aerosol Balance

Uncertainty Budget in the Measurement of Typical Airborne Number, Surface Area and Mass Particle Distributions

Number Concentration Measurements of Polystyrene Submicrometer Particles

Interlaboratory comparison of nanoparticle size measurements between NMIJ and NIST using two different types of dynamic light scattering instruments

Overview of measurements and current instrumentation for 1–10 nm aerosol particle number size distributions

Size Characterization of Airborne SiO 2 Nanoparticles with On-Line and Off-Line Measurement Techniques: an Interlaboratory Comparison Study

Calculation of the Budget of Uncertainty on Measurements Size Nanoparticles Using Dynamic Light Scattering

Factors That Govern Sub-3 Nm Particle Measurements in an Airmodus® PSM and a TSI® DEG–SMPS

Challenges in the size analysis of a silica nanoparticle mixture as candidate certified reference material

Characterization of the TSI model 3086 differential mobility analyzer for classifying aerosols down to 1 nm

Investigation on Measurement of the Sauter Mean Diameter of Particlesin the Atomization Field by Using Laser Scattering Method

A Universal Measurement Method for Nanoparticle Number Concentration Based on Atomic Force Microscope

Aerodynamic Diameter Measurement of Aerosol Particles

Mobility Particle Size Spectrometers: Harmonization of Technical Standards and Data Structure to Facilitate High Quality Long-Term Observations of Atmospheric Particle Number Size Distributions

General Aerosol Sauter Mean Diameter Measurement for Spherical and Non-Spherical Particles Based on Low-Complexity Scattering Algorithm