Comparison of long-term effects of cardiac dual and tri-chamber pacemaker on prevention of paroxysmal atrial tachyarrhythmias

祁述善,周胜华,刘启明
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-6638.2004.06.016
2004-01-01
Abstract:ObjectiveTo investigate the effects of cardiac dual and tri-chamber pacemaker on prevention of paroxysmal atrial tachyarrythmias(PAT).Methods Forty patients with pacemaker indication,frequent PAT,no rheumatic heart disease and hyperthyroidism,and refractory to anti-arrhythmic agents were divided into two groups.Two groups of patients with a dual-chamber (right atrium and ventrile) or a tri-chamber pacemaker (two atria and right ventrile) implanted were followed up in 3,6,12,24 and 36 months after implantation.Following parameters were compared:(1)average frequencies of PAT per week and atrial premature beats per 24 hour;(2)inquiring quality of life(SF-36).ResultsIn dual-chamber group,the frequencies of PAT and atrial premature beats as well as the quality of life were not significantly changed all over the follow-up period(P0.05).In tri-chamber group,parameters mentioned above were not changed in the first three months (P0.05),but in 6,12,24 and 36 months after implantation,they were changed significantly in comparison with both before implantation and dual-chamber group(P0.05).Conclusion Tri-chamber pacing could significantly decrease the frequency of PAT and the quality of life significantly improved in comparison with dual chamber pacing during the mid-and long-term follow-up period.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?