Abstract:<h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Background</h3>Right ventricular apex (RVA) is still the most common implanted site in the world. There are a large number of RVA pacing population who have been carrying dual-chamber permanent pacemaker (PPM) over decades. Comparison of left ventricular dyssynchrony, morphology and systolic function between RVA pacing population and healthy population is unknown.<h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Method</h3>This case-control study enrolled 61 patients suffered from complete atrioventricular block (III°AVB) for replacement of dual-chamber PPM. Then, 61 healthy controls matched with PPM patients in gender, age, follow-up duration and complications were included. The lead impedance, pacing threshold and sensing were compared between at implantation and long-term follow-up. Left ventricular (LV) dyssynchrony, morphology and systolic function were compared between RVA pacing population (RVA group) and healthy population (healthy group) at implantation (baseline) and follow-up. And clarify the predictors of LV systolic function in RVA group at follow-up.<h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Results</h3>After 112.44 ± 34.94 months of follow-up, comparing with parameters at implantation, atrial lead impedance decreased significantly (690 ± 2397 Ω vs 613 ± 2257 Ω, p = 0.048); atrial pacing threshold has a increased trend and P-wave amplitude has a decreased trend, but there was no statistical differences; while, RVA ventricular lead threshold increased significantly (0.50 ± 0.23 V vs 0.91 ± 0.47 V, p < 0.001), impedance (902 ± 397 Ω vs 680 ± 257 Ω,p < 0.001) and R-wave amplitude (11.71 ± 9.40mv vs 7.00 ± 6.91 mv, p < 0.001) decreased significantly. Compared with healthy group, long-term RVA pacing significantly increased ventricular dyssynchrony (mean QRS duration, 156.21 ± 29.80 ms vs 97.08 ± 15.70 ms, p < 0.001), left atrium diameter (LAD, 40.61 ± 6.15 mm vs 37.49 ± 4.80 mm,p = 0.002), left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD, 49.15 ± 5.93 mm vs 46.41 ± 3.80 mm,p = 0.003), left ventricular hypertrophy (LVMI, 121.86 ± 41.52 g/m2 vs 98.41 ± 25.29 g/m2,p < 0.001), significantly deteriorated degree of tricuspid regurgitation (p < 0.001), and significantly decreased left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF, 61.38 ± 8.10% vs 64.64 ± 5.85%, p = 0.012), but after long-term RVA pacing, the mean LVEF was still more than 50%. Long-term RVA group LVEF was negatively correlated with preimplantation LVMI (B = -0.055,t = −2.244,p = 0.029), LVMI at follow-up (B = −0.081,t = −3.864,p = 0.000) and tricuspid regurgitation at follow-up (B = −3.797,t = −3.599,p = 0.001).<h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Conclusion</h3>In conclusion, although long-term RVA pacing has significantly effects on left ventricular dyssynchrony, morphology and systolic function in III°AVB patients, the mean LVEF is still >50%. High preimplantation LVMI can predict the decline of LVEF.

Reduction of Unnecessary Right Ventricular Pacing by Managed Ventricular Pacing and Search AV+ Algorithms in Pacemaker Patients: 12-Month Follow-Up Results of a Randomized Study.

Clinical evaluation of pacemaker automatic capture management and atrioventricular interval extension algorithm.

His-bundle pacing vs biventricular pacing following atrioventricular nodal ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation and reduced ejection fraction: A multicenter, randomized, crossover study-The ALTERNATIVE-AF trial

Electrical Synchrony Optimization for Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing in Patients with Bradycardia and Heart Failure.

The Clinical Observation of Auto AV Search Algorithm in Dual Chamber Pacemaker.

Reducing Unnecessary Right Ventricular Pacing with the Managed Ventricular Pacing Mode in Patients with Sinus Node Disease and AV Block

Upgrade to his bundle pacing in pacing-dependent patients referred for pulse generator change: Feasibility and intermediate term follow up

Clinical Observation on Influence of Right Ventricular Pacing Percentage Using a Search AV Algorithm in Dual Chamber Pacemaker

Is Right Ventricular Outflow Tract Pacing Superior To Right Ventricular Apex Pacing? A Long-Term Follow-Up Study

Systematic review and meta-analysis on the impact on outcomes of device algorithms for minimizing right ventricular pacing

Effects of long-term right ventricular apex pacing on left ventricular dyssynchrony, morphology and systolic function

[Long-Term Effect of Different Right Ventricular Apex Pacing Ratio on Heart Structure and Function of Patients with Dual Chamber Pacemaker].

Clinical outcomes in patients with atrioventricular block undergoing pacemaker: 3-year follow-up

Long-term outcomes of left bundle branch area pacing compared with right ventricular pacing in TAVI patients

Long-term follow-up results of the pacing to avoid cardiac enlargement (PACE) trial.

Influences of right ventricular pacing positions and proportion on ventricular events and heart function

Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing vs. Right Ventricular Pacing for Atrioventricular Block

Comparison of clinical and echocardiographic outcomes between left bundle branch area pacing and right ventricular pacing in older patients

Comparison between left bundle branch area pacing and right ventricular pacing: ventricular electromechanical synchrony and risk of atrial high-rate episodes

Long-term outcomes of TAVI patients undergoing different pacing modality: LBBAP versus RVP

Prognostic benefits of His‐Purkinje capture in physiological pacemakers for bradycardia