Comparison of sensitivity and precision between two dual-energy X-ray absorptiometers in bone models

刘辉文,廖二元,戴如春,伍贤平,邓小戈,雷闽湘,钟惠菊

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1006-7108.2003.03.005

2003-01-01

Abstract:Objective To compare the differences in BA, BMC and BMD estimated with fan beam X ray densitometer (Hologic QDR 4500A) and pencil beam system (Lunar DPX IQ), and to establish the transcalibrating equations between them Methods Bone area (BA), bone mineral content (BMC) and bone mineral density (BMD) of 16 small bone models and an anthropomorphic lumbar spine model were measured with two types of dual energy X ray absorptiometers (Hologic QDR 4500A and Lunar DPX IQ) Results (1) The sensitivity of Hologic QDR 4500A was lower than that of Lunar DPX IQ (2) For small bone models, the intrabatch precision of BA, BMC and BMD were 0 57%,0 8% and 1 1%,respectively, for Hologic QDR 4500A; and ,2 0%,10 0% and 10 4%, respectively, for Lunar DPX IQ The interbatch precision of BA, BMC and BMD were 1 2%, 2 8% and 2 4%, respectively, for Hologic QDR 4500A, and 2 0%,10 3% and 10 5%,respectively, for Lunar DPX IQ, suggesting that the precision of Hologic QDR 4500A was higher than that of Lunar DPX IQ (3)There were significant differences( P 0 05)and positive correlation between the results obtained with the two instruments, and interconversion factors were calculated Conversions of values based on these regression equations are: ①BMD:Hologic=0 802×Lunar+0 318( r=0 991;P 0 001;SEE=0 03 g/cm 2);②BMC:Hologic=1 20×Lunar+1 685( r=0 984; P 0 001;SEE=0 816 g); ③BA:Hologic=1 414×Lunar 1 647( r=0 972; P 0 001;SEE=0 520 cm 2) Conclusion There are differences in sensitivity, precision and absolute values between Hologic QDR 4500A and Lunar DPX IQ dual energy X ray absorptiometers (DEXA) Value conversion based on these regression equations should be used for comparing data from one laboratory to another