Abstract:BackgroundDXA is widely used in clinical practise in BMD measurement of osteoporosis. Forearm and axial BMD is the most common site to define in clinical practise. However, the relationship between forearm and axial BMD is not confirmed in RA patients.ObjectivesTo compare the forearm (bone mineral density) BMD between lumbar spine and left hip BMD by dual-energy X-ray abosorptionmetry (DXA), and explore the diagnostic value of the forearm BMD in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients.MethodsIn the study, 200 female patients with established RA underwent DXA of the lumber, left hip and non-superiority forearm DXA at the same time. We compared BMD at different sites, and the diagnostic cut-off value of abnormal axial BMD by forearm BMD was explored. Data analysis was performed by independent-sample t test and Pearson’s correlation test. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and calibration of predictions were assessed. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated to determine the correlation between cases of osteoporosis detected by the axial DXA scan and forearm.Results(1) The mean age of the 200 female patients was (55.9±13.8) years. Twenty (10.0%) patients had the fragility fracture history. Based on their axial DXA data and fracture history, 30 (15.0%) patients had normal BMD (T score≥-1.0), 170 (85.0%) patients had abnormal BMD. The mean forearm BMD was (0.35±0.13) g/cm2, and T score was -2.3±1.9. (2) Compared with abnormal axial BMD group, forearm BMD in normal axial group was significantly decreased [(0.33±0.13) g/cm2 vs (0.44±0.06) g/cm2, t=4.29, P<0.01], forearm T score was also significantly decreased [(-2.6±1.9) vs (-0.71±0.9), t=4.35, P<0.01]. T score of the forearm BMD was positively correlated with axial BMD T score, both at lumber and left hip respectively (r=0.488, 0.543, P<0.01). After correction by age, T score of the forearm remained positively correlated with axial T score by partial correlation analysis (Pearson partial vertebral r=0.46, P<0.001; left hip r=0.502, P<0.001). (3) The area under the ROC curve for diagnosis of lumber and hip osteoporosis were 0.757 (95%CI: 0.638, 0.876) and 0.615(95%CI: 0.481,0.749) separately. (4) The sensitivity and specificity for identifying osteoporosis in lumber were 86.5% and 50.1% respectively when the T-score threshold of forearm was defined as -3.52; however, the sensitivity and the specificity for identifying osteoporosis at left hip were 66.2% and 76.2% when T score threshold of forearm was defined as -2.5.ConclusionOur study has confirmed that DXA measurement performed of forearm analysis is capable of screening osteoporosis defined by axial BMD in female RA patients.References[1] Siris ES, Adler R, Bilezikian J, et al. The clinical diagnosis of osteoporosis: a position statement from the National Bone Health Alliance Working Group[J]. Osteoporos Int,2014,25(5):1439-1443. DOI: 10.1007/s00198-014-2655-z. [2] Hangartner TN, Warner S, Braillon P, Jankowski L, Shepherd J. The Official Positions of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry: acquisition of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry body composition and considerations regarding analysis and repeatability of measures[J]. J Clin Densitom. 2013. 16(4): 520-536. DOI: 10.1016/j.jocd.2013.08.007 [3] Kilic G, Ozgocmen S. Hand bone mass in rheumatoid arthritis: A review of the literature[J]. World J Orthop. 2015. 6(1): 106-116.DOI: 10.5312/wjo.v6.i1.106AcknowledgementnoneDisclosure of InterestsNone declared

The self-control comparison of ultrasound and DXA in measurement of Bone medical density(BMD) in Hangzhou females

Radiographic Predictors for Bone Mineral Loss CORTICAL THICKNESS AND INDEX OF THE DISTAL FEMUR

Comparative Study of the Accuracies and Efficiencies of Dual-layer Spectral CT, QCT, and DXA for Osteoporosis Diagnosis

Comparison of osteoporosis detected by DXA and QCT in elderly population

Ultrasonic Backscatter Measurements at the Calcaneus: an in Vivo Study

Validation of Quantitative Computed Tomography-Derived Areal Bone Mineral Density with Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry in an Elderly Chinese Population

Differences Between Measurements of Bone Mineral Densities by Quantitative Ultrasound and Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry in Type 2 Diabetic Postmenopausal Women.

Correlation Analysis Between Ultrasonic Apparent Integral Backscatter Coefficient and Bone Mineral Density

Influence of young people's bone mineral densities and their standard deviations on detective rate of osteoporosis:Multicenter and large sample analyses

Comparison between QCT-derived and DXA-derived areal bone mineral density and T scores at the proximal femur

Comparison of forearm bone mineral density between lumbar spine and hip: a useful tool to screen osteoporosis in female patients with connective tissue disease

Reproducibility of hip bone mineral density measurement by quantitative CT and its consistency with DXA bone mineral density

Studies on the Standards for the Bone Mineral Density Measurement at Forearm Skeletal Sites in the Diagnosis of Osteoporosis

Analysis of Apparent Integrated Backscatter Coefficient and Backscattered Spectral Centroid Shift in Calcaneus in Vivo for the Ultrasonic Evaluation of Osteoporosis.

The study of bone mineral density and structure in proximal femur by quantitative CT in elderly Chinese women

AB0356 COMPARISION FOREARM BONE MINERAL DENSITY BETWEEN LUMBAR SPINE AND HIP: A USEFUL TOOL TO SCREEN OSTEOPOROSIS IN FEMALE PATIENTS WITH RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS

Defining disease progression in Chinese mainland people: Association between bone mineral density and knee osteoarthritis

Effect of the Bone Density and Standard Deviation of the Young People to the Prevalence of Osteoporosis

Adjustment of DXA BMD Measurements for Anthropometric Factors and Its Impact on the Diagnosis of Osteoporosis

Comparison of QCT and DXA: Osteoporosis Detection Rates in Postmenopausal Women.

Investigation of lumbar bone mineral density in Shunyi healthy individuals by quantitative computed tomography