Abstract:Objective:To evaluate the short-term precision and accuracy of bone mineral density (BMD) measured with quantitative CT (QCT) and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in multi-centre clinical research with a European spine phantom (ESP).Methods:From January 2016 to April 2020, totally 40 CT scanners (12 Siemens from Germany, 12 Philips from Netherlands, 9 GE from US, 5 Toshiba from Japan, 2 United Imaging from China) and 53 DXA instruments (34 GE Lunar from US, 14 Hologic from US, 5 Medlink from France) used in multi-centre in China were enrolled. The CT equipment came from 31 centers and DXA equipment from 32 centers.Using Mindways QCT software, the ESP was scanned 10 times on each instrument with repositioning using standardized spine protocols with QCT and DXA. The BMD value of the three lumbar vertebrae with low, medium, high density and the mean BMD value were measured. Accuracy was assessed by comparing BMD values measured on each device with the actual value of the phantom. Short-term precision was calculated as the root-mean-square standard deviation (RMS-SD) and root-mean-square standard deviation coefficient of variation (RMS-%CV) for the repeated measurements. The repeated measures variance analysis was used to compare the differences in BMD between different devices.Results:The differences in BMD values were statistically significant among different CT and DXA devices.The ranges of the accuracy measured by different QCT devices were 1.20% to 7.60% for Siemens, -1.83% to 0.20% for Philips, 1.18% to 13.20% for GE, -0.12% to 3.55% for Toshiba, -1.65% to 6.32% for United Imaging, 6.59% to 21.34% for GE Lunar, -6.65% to 5.45% for Hologic, and -6.97% to -0.68% for Medlink, respectively. The RMS-%CV of all vertebral BMD values measured by QCT and DXA ranged from 0.38% to 3.85%. The RMS-SD of QCT was 0.54 to 2.45 mg/cm 3, of DXA was 0.009 to 0.037 g/cm 2. The RMS-%CV values of each vertebral body measured by different QCT and DXA devices decreased with the increase of BMD, while the RMS-SD values showed the opposite tendency. Conclusions:Based on ESP, the QCT and DXA devices have significant differences in lumbar spine BMD measurement. Comparing the measurement results among different devices requires cross-calibration. Overall, the accuracy and short-term precision are within a reasonable range, which can be used for clinical follow-up observation. The short-term precision error and accuracy error range of QCT in evaluating the density of ESP were slightly smaller than those of DXA.

Comparison of accuracy and precision between two dual-energy X-ray absorptiometers

The Protocol of Ultrasonic Backscatter Measurements of Musculoskeletal Properties

Evaluation of precision and accuracy of bone mineral densitometry

The self-control comparison of ultrasound and DXA in measurement of Bone medical density(BMD) in Hangzhou females

Validation of Asynchronous Quantitative Bone Densitometry of the Spine: Accuracy, Short-Term Reproducibility, and a Comparison with Conventional Quantitative Computed Tomography

Bone Mineral Density at the Ankle Measured with Quantitative CT (QCT)

Universal standardization of forearm bone densitometry.

Accuracy, Linearity and Precision of Spine QCT Vbmd Phantom Measurements for Different Brands of CT Scanner: A Multicentre Study

Long-Term Reproducibility of BMD-Measurements with Clinical QCT Using Simultaneous and Asynchronous Calibration Methods and Different Measurement and Reconstruction Protocols

Comparative Study of the Accuracies and Efficiencies of Dual-layer Spectral CT, QCT, and DXA for Osteoporosis Diagnosis

Assessment of Precision and Accuracy of Bone Mineral Measurement by Using Spectral CT Imaging:Phantom Study

Quantitative assessment of areal bone mineral density using multi-energy localizer radiographs from photon-counting detector CT

A preliminary study of the correlation and agreement of bone mineral density measurements between rapid-kilovoltage-switching dual-energy CT and QCT

Accuracy and precision of volumetric bone mineral density assessment using dual-source dual-energy versus quantitative CT: a phantom study

Comparison between QCT-derived and DXA-derived areal bone mineral density and T scores at the proximal femur

Small animal DXA instrument comparison and validation

Comparison and precision of the XCT 3000 and XCT 2000 peripheral quantitative computer tomography densitometers for geometric and material bone parameters of the radius

Accuracy of Phantomless Calibration of Routine Computed Tomography Scans for Opportunistic Osteoporosis Screening in the Spine Clinic

The new fast kilovoltage-switching dual-energy computed tomography for measuring bone mineral density

Diagnostic Accuracy of Dual-Energy CT Material Decomposition Technique for Assessing Bone Status Compared with Quantitative Computed Tomography

HR-pQCT cross-calibration using standard vs. Laplace-Hamming binarization approach