Effect of Preparation Methods on Activation of Catalysts

Qian Yu,Lin Yu,Yuanna WANG,Qini Zhang,Ming Sun,Yingmin Huang,Yeyu Lu,Zaochuan Ge
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1004-9541(08)60094-4
IF: 3.8
2008-01-01
Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering
Abstract:Catalytic combustion of dimethyl ether (DME) over hexaaluminate catalyst BaNi0.2Mn0.8Al11O19-δ has been investigated. The catalysts were prepared with the sol-gel method and reverse microemulsion method respectively and characterized by thermogravimetry-differential thermal analysis, X-ray diffraction and transimission electron microscope. It was found that the formation of Mn, Ni modified hexaaluminate was a relatively slow process via two solid state reactions and spinel structure was a transition phase. At the same calcined temperature and time, the catalyst prepared with the reverse microemulsion method could form the hexaaluminate phase more easily than that prepared with the sol-gel method. The catalyst BaNi0.2Mn0.8Al11O19-δ prepared with the reverse micro-emulsion method appeared a plate-like morphology, while it appeared a needle-like morphology when using the sol-gel method. The catalytic activities of catalysts BaNi0.2Mn0.8Al11O19-δ prepared with two different methods for DME combustion were tested. It showed that catalyst prepared with the reverse microemulsion method had better catalytic activity, i.e. T10% of DME had decreased by 45°C, about 90% conversion of diemthyl ether at 380°C.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?