Effect of the Preparation Method on the Performance of CuO–MnOx–CeO2 Catalysts for Selective Oxidation of CO in H2-rich Streams

Jing Li
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.07.052
IF: 9.2
2011-01-01
Journal of Power Sources
Abstract:Selective oxidation of CO in H2-rich streams is performed over a series of CuO–MnOx–CeO2 catalysts prepared by hydrothermal (CuMC-HY), co-precipitation (CuMC-CP), impregnation (CuMC-IM) and citrate sol–gel (CuMC-SG) methods. The catalysts are characterized by N2 adsorption/desorption, XRD, SEM, HR-TEM, TPR and XPS techniques. The results show that the catalyst prepared by a hydrothermal method exhibits the best catalytic activity, especially at low temperatures. The temperature of 50% CO conversion (T50) is only 74°C and the temperature window of CO conversions up to 99.0% is about 40°C wide, from 110 to 140°C. Moreover, the temperature window is still maintained 20°C wide even at lower temperatures when there are 15% CO2 and 7.5% H2O in the reaction gas. The superior catalytic performance of CuMC-HY is attributed to the formation of Mn–Cu–Ce–O solid solution, the unique pore structure and the existence of more Cu+ and Mn4+ species as well as oxygen vacancies. The sequence of catalytic activity is as follows: CuMC-HY>CuMC-SG>CuMC-IM>CuMC-CP. The worst catalytic activity, obtained from the catalyst prepared by the co-precipitation method, is possibly related to the existence of independent CuOx and MnOx oxides, which weakly interact with ceria in the catalyst.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?