Abstract:The anion conductive polymers based on the aryl ether-free polyaromatics (poly[(fluorene alkylene)-co-(biphenyl alkylene)] (PFBA), poly(fluorene alkylene) (PFA)) and aryl ether-containing polyaromatics (poly(2,6-dimethyl-1,4-phenylene oxide) (PPO)) having various cation groups (quaternary ammonium (QA) or bulky imidazolium (MIm or PIm)) were designed and prepared to investigate the effect of polymer backbones and cation functional groups on the properties of anion exchange membranes (AEMs) in fuel cells. The PFBA AEM having bulky imidazolium group showed good mechanical properties while the PPO AEM with the same cation break into the pieces. The alkalinity of the bulky imidazoliums have determined to be weaker than that of the typical quaternary ammonium by the simulation. Thus, the high hydroxide conductivities of the AEMs based on the quaternary ammonium group have been observed. Although the alkaline stability testing in 2 mol L−1 NaOH at 80 °C indicated the AEMs based on the PFBA backbone are much more alkaline stable than that of the AEMs from PPO backbone, the PFA-QA having typical quaternary ammonium showed significant degradation signals in 2 mol L−1 NaOD CD3OD/D2O solution at 80 °C for 15 days while PFA-MIm with bulky imidazolium groups showed no degradation signal at the same testing condition. The single H2/O2 fuel cell testing at 60 °C suggested the polymer backbone and cations displayed significant effect on the fuel cell performance. The highest peak power density of 610 mW cm−2 was achieved for PFBA-QA-0.4 which is approximate twice as high as that of the PPO-QA-0.4 (351 mW cm−2) and also the PFBA-MIm-0.4 having bulky imidazolium (32 mW cm−2). The device durability test indicates that the voltage of PFBA-QA-0.4 membrane could be maintained above 0.7 V at 200 mA cm−2 for 74 h. These results suggested that the aryl ether-free polymer backbone would be a good choice for the high performance AEM designation, and the AEMs having alkaline stable bulky imidazoliums needed to be further investigated in detail to achieve excellent fuel cell performance.

The affects of membrane on the cell performance when using alkaline borohydride–hydrazine solutions as the fuel

Effects of hydrazine addition on gas evolution and performance of the direct borohydride fuel cell

Introducing Catalyst in Alkaline Membrane for Improved Performance Direct Borohydride Fuel Cells

Effects of Hydrolysis Degree on Ion-Doped Anion Exchange Membranes in Direct Borohydride Fuel Cells

Evaluation of Alkaline Borohydride Solutions As the Fuel for Fuel Cell

Effects of NaOH Addition on Performance of the Direct Hydrazine Fuel Cell

Performance improvement of a micro borohydride fuel cell operating at ambient conditions

Study on Direct Hydrazine Borane Fuel Cell Based on Anion Exchange Membrane

A Study of the Direct Dimethyl Ether Fuel Cell Using Alkaline Anolyte

Influence of Operation Conditions on Direct NaBH_4/H_2O_2 Fuel Cell Performance

A Study on Performance Stability of the Passive Direct Borohydride Fuel Cell

A Highly Stable Cu(OH)2-Poly(vinyl Alcohol) Nanocomposite Membrane for Dramatically Enhanced Direct Borohydride Fuel Cell Performance

Bilayer Anion-Exchange Membrane with Low Borohydride Crossover and Improved Fuel Efficiency for Direct Borohdyride Fuel Cell.

A Fuel Cell Development for Using Borohydrides As the Fuel

Fuel Permeability of Anion Exchange Membranes under Electric Field

Anion-Exchange Membranes for Alkaline Fuel-Cell Applications: The Effects of Cations

The Effect of Polymer Backbones and Cation Functional Groups on Properties of Anion Exchange Membranes for Fuel Cells

Performance Degradation of A Direct Borohydride Fuel Cell

Functionalization of Polyvinyl Alcohol Composite Membrane by CoOOH for Direct Borohydride Fuel Cells

Hydrogen storage alloys as the anode materials of the direct borohydride fuel cell

Direct Borohydride Fuel Cell Performance Using Hydroxide‐conducting Polymeric Nanocomposite Electrolytes