Abstract:Epistemic injustice has undergone a steady growth in the medical ethics literature throughout the last decade as many ethicists have found it to be a powerful tool for describing and assessing morally problematic situations in healthcare. However, surprisingly scarce attention has been devoted to how epistemic injustice relates to physicians' professional duties on a conceptual level. I argue that epistemic injustice, specifically testimonial, collides with physicians' duty of nonmaleficence and should thus be actively fought against in healthcare encounters on the ground of professional conduct. I do so by fleshing out how Fricker's conception of testimonial injustice conflicts with the duty of nonmaleficence as defined in Beauchamp and Childress on theoretical grounds. From there, I argue that testimonial injustice produces two distinct types of harm, epistemic and non-epistemic. Epistemic harms are harms inflicted by the physician to the patient qua knower, whereas non-epistemic harms are inflicted to the patient qua patient. This latter case holds serious clinical implications and represent a failure of the process of due care on the part of the physician. I illustrate this through examples taken from the literature on fibromyalgia syndrome and show how testimonial injustice causes wrongful harm to patients, making it maleficent practice. Finally, I conclude on why nonmaleficence as a principle will not be normatively enough to fully address the problem of epistemic injustice in healthcare but nevertheless may serve as a good starting point in attempting to do so.

Testimonial Evidence and Its Definition

The Concept of Evidence: Its History of Evolution and Its Epistemological Reconstruction

Hume's Reductionism of Testimony: Hot Water and Way Out

Pragmatic Commitments to Naturalized Epistemology

Scientific and religious beliefs are primarily shaped by testimony

Learning from Testimony on Quantitative Research in Management

The Expert Testimony System in Anglo-American Evidence Law

A Feminist Interpretation of Hume on Testimony

Gauging Court Adjudication: Qualification And Quantification

On Evidence in Philosophy by William Lycan

Testification Standard in Criminal Lawsuit

On the Theories of Examination,Admissibility and Evaluation of Evidence

"Conviction" or "Credulity":The Evidentialism's Puzzles and Its Outlets

The Challenge of Experimental Epistemology to Classic Thought Experiments

Testimonial Injustice in Sports

Judgement on Evidence Attribute ——enlightenment on Comparative Law and Law Methodology

The Testimony or the Eyewitness? Factors That Influence Eyewitness Credibility Assessment Conducted by (Future) Fact-Finders and Laypeople

Basic Jurisprudence of Expert Testimony Effect

The Definition and Measurement of "Evidence" in Evidence-Based Management

Epistemic Injustice and Nonmaleficence

On the Legality Requirements of Evidence in Civil Action