Abstract:Purpose of the study: Because children's own perception, memory and expressive powers differ significantly from those of adults, resulting in a difference between child and adult witnesses, the debate on the competence of the child as a witness has shifted to a judgement on the reliability of the child's testimony in the context of the development of psycho-cognitive science. Methodology: The physiological and psychological characteristics of child witnesses determine their deficiencies in the encoding, storage and extraction of memory information, and therefore the reliability of child testimonies is a key and difficult issue. For this reason, this paper uses documentary analysis to further analyse child witness testimony as the focus of the study. Main Findings: A psychological analysis of the multiple factors that affect the reliability of children's testimony. Two conclusions are drawn: 1. Children are in principle competent to testify. The development of children's testimonial competence leads to the conclusion that even very young children can remember events that happened long ago, especially if they already have prior knowledge about them. 2. Practical guidance for improving the truthfulness of the content of child witness statements improves the reliability of child witness testimony. Children can be influenced in a variety of ways to recount detailed and complete accounts of events that did not occur, such that professionals are unable to distinguish between false and truthful accounts. Perhaps the next step is to improve "questioning techniques". Novelty of the study: Correct and reliable witness testimony is key to the investigation and trial process. The importance of child witness testimony has become increasingly apparent in recent years as the number of cases involving children has increased. This issue has previously only been the focus of jurists, and this study analyses it from a psychological perspective, laying the groundwork for subsequent research in law and psychology.

The Testimony or the Eyewitness? Factors That Influence Eyewitness Credibility Assessment Conducted by (Future) Fact-Finders and Laypeople

Eyewitness confidence in the interviewing context: Understanding the impact of question type and order

Laypeople's beliefs about the effects of common estimator variables on memory

Convicting with confidence? Why we should not over-rely on eyewitness confidence

Psychological analysis of child witness testimony

Mock jurors' evaluations of eyewitness identification evidence based on appearance change and associated instructions

Interrogation questions to native and non‐native eyewitnesses: The role of witness credibility

Witness self-efficacy: development and validation of the construct

Will your words become mine? Underlying processes and cowitness intimacy in the memory conformity paradigm.

Contesting Confessions: Opinions of Expert Witnesses

Mock Juror Perceptions of Eyewitness Reports Given by Children with Intellectual Disabilities

Investigator Sensitivity to Alibi Witness Inconsistency after a Long Delay

Narrative Style and Witness Testimony

Perceptions of bias and credibility of male and female clinical psychologist and psychiatrist expert witnesses presenting clinical information in the courtroom

Jury instructions should prioritize reflector variables recorded during the first test of an eyewitness' memory.

Impact of the Passage of Time on the Correct Identification of the Speaker Using the Auditory Method

A decision processes account of the differences in the eyewitness confidence-accuracy relationship between strong and weak face recognizers under suboptimal exposure and delay conditions.

Partners under Pressure: Examining the Consistency of True and False Alibi Statements

Assessing Verbal Eyewitness Confidence Statements Using Natural Language Processing

Police evaluation of evidence: statistical format and evidence type

Truth-tellers stand the test of time and contradict evidence less than liars, even months after a crime.