Abstract:When pristine testing conditions are used, an eyewitness's high-confidence identification from a lineup can be a reliable predictor of their identification accuracy (Wixted & Wells, 2017). Further, Grabman, Dobolyi, Berelovich, and Dodson (2019) found that high-confidence identifications are more predictive of accuracy for individuals with stronger than weaker face recognition ability. We extend this research by investigating why strong face recognizers make more informative confidence judgments and fewer high-confidence errors through the framework of two different accounts: the optimality account (Deffenbacher, 1980) and the decision processes account (e.g., Kruger & Dunning, 1999). The optimality account holds that differences in the predictive value of confidence ratings made by strong versus weak face recognizers are a result of differences in the quality of their memory representations for faces, indicating that confidence-accuracy calibration would be equated between these two groups when overall accuracy is equated, whereas the decision processes account attributes differences in calibration to strong face recognizers' superior metacognitive skills, which allow them to better evaluate their performance in the domain of face recognition. Therefore, to distinguish between these accounts, we manipulated exposure and retention interval to create conditions that produced comparable levels of identification accuracy between stronger and weaker face recognizers, and then examined their confidence-accuracy calibration. The decision processes account was supported, as differences in calibration between stronger and weaker face recognizers persisted even when overall identification accuracy was equated. Stronger face recognizers are better able to regulate their use of the confidence scale points with changes in identification accuracy. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved)

A decision processes account of the differences in the eyewitness confidence-accuracy relationship between strong and weak face recognizers under suboptimal exposure and delay conditions.

Eyewitness Decision Processes: A Valid Reflector Variable

Evaluating eyewitnesses: Translating expressions of pre‐ and post‐identification confidence

Laypeople's beliefs about the effects of common estimator variables on memory

Predicting and postdicting eyewitness identification accuracy on forensic-object lineups.

Improving the diagnostic value of lineup rejections

EXPRESS: Face matching and self-insight: A Registered Report investigating individual differences in metacognitive sensitivity, efficiency, and bias

Variability in verbal eyewitness confidence

Assessing Verbal Eyewitness Confidence Statements Using Natural Language Processing

Perceptual Expertise of Forensic Examiners and Reviewers on Tests of Cross‐Race and Disguised Face Identification and Face Memory

Response bias modulates the confidence‐accuracy relationship for both positive identifications and lineup rejections in a simultaneous lineup task

Reflector variables in augmented reality lineups: Assessing eyewitness identification reliability in children and adults with confidence, response time, and proximity to the lineup

Testing a potential alternative to traditional identification procedures: Reaction time-based concealed information test does not work for lineups with cooperative witnesses

Criterion shifting in an unfamiliar face-matching task: Effects of base rates, payoffs, and perceptual discriminability.

EYEWITNESS RECALL AND PHOTO IDENTIFICATION: A FIELD EXPERIMENT

Eyewitness confidence in the interviewing context: Understanding the impact of question type and order

General recognition theory with individual differences: a new method for examining perceptual and decisional interactions with an application to face perception

Convicting with confidence? Why we should not over-rely on eyewitness confidence

Confidence judgments interfere with perceptual decision making

Children's strategic regulation during a confidence lineup paradigm

Everyday amnesia: Residual memory for high confidence misses and implications for decision models of recognition.