Abstract:Determining one's confidence in a decision is a vital part of decision-making. Traditionally, psychological experiments have assessed a person's confidence by eliciting confidence judgments. The notion that such judgments can be elicited without impacting the accuracy of the decision has recently been challenged by several studies which have shown reactivity effects—either an increase or decrease in decision accuracy when confidence judgments are elicited. Evidence for the direction of reactivity effects has, however, been decidedly mixed. Here, we report three studies designed to specifically make reactivity effects more prominent by eliciting confidence judgment contemporaneously with perceptual decisions. We show that confidence judgments elicited contemporaneously produce an impairment in decision accuracy, this suggests that confidence judgments may rely on a partially distinct set of cues/evidence than the primary perceptual decision and, additionally, challenges the continued use of confidence ratings as an unobtrusive measure of metacognition.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The main problem that this paper attempts to solve is whether such confidence assessment will affect the accuracy of decision - making when participants evaluate their confidence levels while making perceptual decisions. Specifically, the researchers designed three experiments to explore the effects of contemporaneous confidence judgments (CCJ) and retrospective confidence judgments (RCJ) on decision - making time and accuracy, and tried to reveal whether there are reactivity effects in the confidence assessment process, that is, whether confidence assessment will interfere with the decision - making process. ### Main research questions: 1. **Does confidence assessment affect the accuracy of decision - making?** The researchers verified through experimental design whether contemporaneous confidence assessment would reduce the accuracy of decision - making. 2. **What are the direction and intensity of the reactivity effect?** By comparing contemporaneous confidence assessment and retrospective confidence assessment, the researchers attempted to determine the specific direction (increasing or decreasing accuracy) of the reactivity effect and its intensity. 3. **Does confidence assessment rely on cues or evidence different from those of the main perceptual decision?** The researchers hoped to explore through experimental results whether the information on which confidence assessment depends partially overlaps or is completely independent of the information on which the main decision depends. ### Experimental design: - **Experiment 1**: Compare the decision - making time and accuracy under contemporaneous confidence assessment (CCJ) and the control condition. - **Experiment 2**: Further introduce retrospective confidence assessment (RCJ) and compare it with contemporaneous confidence assessment (CCJ) and the control condition. - **Experiment 3**: By introducing the post - stimulus interval (PSI), explore whether the reactivity effect is caused by the complexity of response options or by making decisions and confidence assessment simultaneously. ### Main findings: - **Experiment 1**: Contemporaneous confidence assessment significantly reduced the accuracy of decision - making and increased the decision - making time. - **Experiment 2**: Retrospective confidence assessment had no significant effect on decision - making time and accuracy, while contemporaneous confidence assessment continued to show a negative reactivity effect. - **Experiment 3**: When the post - stimulus interval was introduced, the negative impact of contemporaneous confidence assessment on decision - making accuracy disappeared, and only had a weaker impact on decision - making time. ### Conclusion: This paper clearly demonstrated through three experiments that when participants evaluate their confidence levels while making perceptual decisions, such confidence assessment will significantly reduce the accuracy of decision - making and increase the decision - making time. This finding challenges the traditional view that confidence assessment will not interfere with the decision - making process. The research results indicate that confidence assessment may rely on cues or evidence different from those of the main perceptual decision, which provides a new perspective for understanding the role of confidence assessment in the decision - making process.

Confidence judgments interfere with perceptual decision making

Metacognitive Introspection Alters the Dynamics of Pre-Decisional Neural Evidence Accumulation

Metacognitive evaluation of postdecisional perceptual representations

The effects of non-diagnostic information on confidence and decision making

Metacognition-related regions modulate the reactivity effect of confidence ratings on perceptual decision-making.

Does perceptual confidence facilitate cognitive control?

When temporal attention lacks confidence

Confidence Is the Bridge between Multi-stage Decisions

A decision-congruent heuristic gives superior metacognitive sensitivity under realistic variance assumptions.

How Our Perception and Confidence Are Altered Using Decision Cues

Confidence over competence: Real-time integration of social information in human continuous perceptual decision-making

Modeling confidence judgments, response times, and multiple choices in decision making: Recognition memory and motion discrimination.

Long-term perceptual priors drive confidence bias which favors prior-congruent evidence

Modeling perceptual confidence and the confidence forced-choice paradigm.

Re-evaluating frontopolar and temporoparietal contributions to detection and discrimination confidence

A decision processes account of the differences in the eyewitness confidence-accuracy relationship between strong and weak face recognizers under suboptimal exposure and delay conditions.

Subjective Confidence as a Monitor of the Replicability of the Response

Temporal stability of Bayesian belief updating in perceptual decision-making

Metacognitive Information Theory

An automatic domain-general error signal is shared across tasks and predicts confidence in different sensory modalities

Modelling Speed-Accuracy Tradeoffs in the Stopping Rule for Confidence Judgments