Distinct neural markers of evidence accumulation index metacognitive processing before and after simple visual decisions

Caleb Stone,Jason B Mattingley,Stefan Bode,Dragan Rangelov

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhae179

IF: 4.861

2024-05-08

Cerebral Cortex

Abstract:Perceptual decision-making is affected by uncertainty arising from the reliability of incoming sensory evidence (perceptual uncertainty) and the categorization of that evidence relative to a choice boundary (categorical uncertainty). Here, we investigated how these factors impact the temporal dynamics of evidence processing during decision-making and subsequent metacognitive judgments. Participants performed a motion discrimination task while electroencephalography was recorded. We manipulated perceptual uncertainty by varying motion coherence, and categorical uncertainty by varying the angular offset of motion signals relative to a criterion. After each trial, participants rated their desire to change their mind. High uncertainty impaired perceptual and metacognitive judgments and reduced the amplitude of the centro-parietal positivity, a neural marker of evidence accumulation. Coherence and offset affected the centro-parietal positivity at different time points, suggesting that perceptual and categorical uncertainty affect decision-making in sequential stages. Moreover, the centro-parietal positivity predicted participants' metacognitive judgments: larger predecisional centro-parietal positivity amplitude was associated with less desire to change one's mind, whereas larger postdecisional centro-parietal positivity amplitude was associated with greater desire to change one's mind, but only following errors. These findings reveal a dissociation between predecisional and postdecisional evidence processing, suggesting that the CPP tracks potentially distinct cognitive processes before and after a decision.

neurosciences

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is to explore how perceptual uncertainty and categorical uncertainty affect the temporal dynamics of evidence accumulation during the decision - making process and the subsequent metacognitive judgments. Specifically, the researchers manipulated motion coherence and angular offset to influence perceptual uncertainty and categorical uncertainty respectively, in order to observe how these factors affect the decision - making behaviors of participants and their confidence in the decisions. The study also utilized the centro - parietal positivity (CPP), a neural marker, to analyze its changes under different conditions, in order to reveal whether there are differences in the evidence - processing process before and after the decision. These findings are helpful for understanding how the brain makes decisions in the face of uncertainty and how it evaluates the quality of these decisions.