Abstract:We have built a neuronal model of decision making. Our model performs a decision based on an imperfect discrimination between highly mixed stimuli, and expresses it with a saccadic eye movement, like real living beings. We use populations of integrate-and-fire neurons. To take a decision that depends on imperfectly separated stimuli, we use a model inspired by the principle of accumulation of evidence. More precisely, this accumulation of evidence is performed by a competition between groups of neurons that model a visual column in the lateral intra-parietal area (area LIP) of the brain. In this column, we have groups of neurons that are sensitive to specific stimuli on which the decision is based. They inhibit each other through groups of inhibitory neurons. Simultaneously, they recursively excite themselves through recurrent synaptic excitation, and all the neurons receive a steady low-level excitation from the rest of the brain. The competition is generated by these recurrent inhibitory and excitatory loops. We study this structure within the framework of dynamical systems. The variables we use are the activities of each group of neurons. This dynamical system has several stable states: one of them occurs when all activities are weak, and other ones when one local group of neurons has a higher activity and dominates the others through lateral inhibition. The convergence to one of these stable states models decision making, guided by sensory evidence. The group of neurons sensitive to the specific stimulus has a comparative advantage on the others during the competition. This structure is not a new idea, but we use it to test our hypothesis on the way the brain controls the dynamics of decision making. Our hypothesis is that the statistical signature of the low-level activity of the brain modifies the stability of the attractors of our model, and thus changes the dynamics of the competition that models decision making. The criterion by which we judge that a decision is taken is more realistic than just looking at the decisive neurons' activities. We model a saccadic eye movement directed by the activities of our LIP neurons, and we read the decision from the position of the eye. This experimental setup is comparable to biophysical experiments in which living beings express their decisions by saccadic eye movements. The neurons of the LIP column in which the decisions take place are modeled as neurons in a real brain: besides the stimuli and the recurrent interactions, they receive significant inputs from the rest of the brain. It is well known that neurons in the brain are highly influenced by this activity, called low-level background activity. We study how the dynamics of the decision making change as a function of the first-order statistics (mean) and second-order statistics (variance) of this global low-level background activity or noise. By studying its influence on the reaction time and error rate, we show that this background activity may be used to control the dynamics of decision making. We compare the performance of such a model (error rate as a function of reaction time) to the performance of living beings during psychophysical experiments. By doing so, we assess the plausibility of the hypothesis that decisions be controlled by the statistical signature of the low-level background activity of the brain.

Evidence for belief updating in decision-variable space: past decisions with finer granularity attract future ones more strongly

Trial-history biases in evidence accumulation can give rise to apparent lapses in decision-making

Distinct neural markers of evidence accumulation index metacognitive processing before and after simple visual decisions

Neural variability compresses with increasing belief precision during Bayesian inference

How Awareness Changes the Relative Weights of Evidence During Human Decision-Making

Residual Information of Previous Decision Affects Evidence Accumulation in Current Decision

Normative evidence weighting and accumulation in correlated environments

Dissociable encoding of evolving beliefs and momentary belief updates in distinct neural decision signals

Normative decision rules in changing environments

Long-term perceptual priors drive confidence bias which favors prior-congruent evidence

Employment of time-varying sensory evidence to test the mechanisms underlying flexible decision-making

Competing neural representations of choice shape evidence accumulation in humans

Adaptive Integration of Perceptual and Reward Information in an Uncertain World

Prior probability cues bias sensory encoding with increasing task exposure

Modeling the Evolution of Beliefs Using an Attentional Focus Mechanism

Temporal stability of Bayesian belief updating in perceptual decision-making

Probabilistic vs. non-probabilistic approaches to the neurobiology of perceptual decision-making

Confirmation Bias through Selective Use of Evidence in Human Cortex

Neuronal Model of Decision Making

How relevant is the prior? Bayesian causal inference for dynamic perception in volatile environments