Abstract:Numerous studies have found that the Bayesian framework, which formulates the optimal integration of the knowledge of the world (i.e. prior) and current sensory evidence (i.e. likelihood), captures human behaviours sufficiently well. However, there are debates regarding whether humans use precise but cognitively demanding Bayesian computations for behaviours. Across two studies, we trained participants to estimate hidden locations of a target drawn from priors with different levels of uncertainty. In each trial, scattered dots provided noisy likelihood information about the target location. Participants showed that they learned the priors and combined prior and likelihood information to infer target locations in a Bayes fashion. We then introduced a transfer condition presenting a trained prior and a likelihood that has never been put together during training. How well participants integrate this novel likelihood with their learned prior is an indicator of whether participants perform Bayesian computations. In one study, participants experienced the newly introduced likelihood, which was paired with a different prior, during training. Participants changed likelihood weighting following expected directions although the degrees of change were significantly lower than Bayes-optimal predictions. In another group, the novel likelihoods were never used during training. We found people integrated a new likelihood within (interpolation) better than the one outside (extrapolation) the range of their previous learning experience and they were quantitatively Bayes-suboptimal in both. We replicated the findings of both studies in a validation dataset. Our results showed that Bayesian behaviours may not always be achieved by a full Bayesian computation. Future studies can apply our approach to different tasks to enhance the understanding of decision-making mechanisms. Bayesian decision theory has emerged as a unified approach for capturing a wide range of behaviours under uncertainty. However, behavioural evidence supporting that humans use explicit Bayesian computation is scarce. While it has been argued that knowledge generalization should be treated as hard evidence of the use of Bayesian strategies, results from previous work were inconclusive. Here, we develop a marker that effectively quantifies how well humans transfer learned priors to a new scenario. Our marker can be applied to various tasks and thus can provide a path forwarding the understanding of psychological and biological underpinnings of inferential behaviours.

How relevant is the prior? Bayesian causal inference for dynamic perception in volatile environments

To integrate or not to integrate: Temporal dynamics of hierarchical Bayesian causal inference

Bayesian inference by visuomotor neurons in prefrontal cortex

Temporal stability of Bayesian belief updating in perceptual decision-making

Prior probability cues bias sensory encoding with increasing task exposure

Long-term perceptual priors drive confidence bias which favors prior-congruent evidence

Causal inference in perception

The implications of perception as probabilistic inference for correlated neural variability during behavior

Post-decision biases reveal a self-consistency principle in perceptual inference

Causal inference predicts the transition from integration to segmentation in motion perception

Humans use overconfident estimates of auditory spatial and temporal uncertainty for perceptual inference

Uncertainty-based causal inference modulates audiovisual temporal recalibration

Bayesian Prior Uncertainty and Surprisal Elicit Distinct Neural Patterns During Sound Localization in Dynamic Environments

Neural dynamics of causal inference in the macaque frontoparietal circuit

Are we really Bayesian? Probabilistic inference shows sub-optimal knowledge transfer

Modulations of Insular Projections by Prior Belief Mediate the Precision of Prediction Error During Tactile Learning.

Bayesian motion estimation accounts for a surprising bias in 3D vision

Probability Matching as a Computational Strategy Used in Perception

Priors for natural image statistics inform confidence in perceptual decisions

Probabilistic vs. non-probabilistic approaches to the neurobiology of perceptual decision-making