Abstract:Our brains predict future sensory input based on their current beliefs about the world around us, but interpreting prediction errors can be challenging in a volatile environment because they can be caused by stochastic noise or by outdated predictions. Noisy signals should be integrated with prior beliefs to improve precision, but the two should be segregated when environmental changes render prior beliefs irrelevant. Bayesian inference provides a statistically optimal solution to deal with situations in which there is uncertainty about the cause of the prediction errors. However, the method quickly becomes memory intensive and computationally intractable when applied consecutively. Here, we systematically evaluate the predictive performance of Bayesian causal inference for human perceptual decisions in a spatial prediction task based on noisy audiovisual sequences with occasional changepoints. We elucidate the simplifying assumptions of a previously proposed reduced Bayesian observer model, and we compare it to an extensive set of models based on alternative simplification strategies. Model-free analyses revealed the hallmarks of Bayesian causal inference: participants seem to have integrated sensory evidence with prior beliefs to improve accuracy when prediction errors were small, and prior influence gradually decreased as prediction errors grew larger, signalling probable irrelevance of the prior due to a changepoint. Model comparison results further supported the hypotheses that participants computed probability-weighted averages over the causal options (noise or changepoint) and that they iteratively summarized their beliefs while accounting for causal uncertainty akin to the reduced Bayesian observer model. However, we also found that participants' reliance on prior beliefs was systematically smaller than predicted by the model, and this was best explained by individually fitting lower-than-optimal parameters for the a-priori probability of prior relevance. We conclude that perceptual belief updating in volatile environments with stochastic noise is well described by a simplified model of consecutive Bayesian causal inference. Observers utilize priors flexibly to the extent that they are deemed relevant, though also conservatively with a lower tendency to bind than an ideal Bayesian observer.

Causal inference in perception

Multisensory Causal Inference in the Brain

Solving the causal inference problem

Neural dynamics of causal inference in the macaque frontoparietal circuit

Causal Perception

How relevant is the prior? Bayesian causal inference for dynamic perception in volatile environments

A Normative Theory for Causal Inference and Bayes Factor Computation in Neural Circuits

Social cues help us construct the causal perception of physical events

Perceived Causalities of Physical Events Are Influenced by Social Cues

Causal inference predicts the transition from integration to segmentation in motion perception

Post-decision biases reveal a self-consistency principle in perceptual inference

Visual adaptation of the perception of causality

A unified neural circuit of causal inference and multisensory integration

The Bayesian Causal Inference in Multisensory Information Processing: A Narrative Review

Consciousness as a logically consistent and prognostic model of reality

The Anatomy of Inference: Generative Models and Brain Structure

Towards Unifying Perceptual Reasoning and Logical Reasoning

Causal inference during closed-loop navigation: parsing of self- and object-motion

Interhemispheric Multisensory Perception and Bayesian Causal Inference.

Learning Perceptual Causality from Video

To integrate or not to integrate: Temporal dynamics of hierarchical Bayesian causal inference