Abstract:Within a Bayesian framework, both our perceptual decisions and confidence about those decisions are based on the precision-weighted integration of prior expectations and incoming sensory information. This assumes priors to influence both decisions and confidence in the same way. Against this assumption, asymmetries have been found in the influence that priors have on confidence compared to discrimination decisions. However, these patterns were found for high-level probabilistic expectations that are flexibly induced in the task context. It remains unclear whether this generalizes to low-level perceptual priors that are naturally formed through long term exposure. Here we investigated human participants' confidence in decisions made under the influence of a long-term perceptual prior: the slow-motion prior. Participants viewed moving line stimuli for which the slow-motion prior biases the perceived motion direction. On each trial, they made two consecutive motion direction decisions followed by a confidence decision. We contrasted two conditions - one in which the prior biased perceptual decisions and one in which decisions were driven by the sensory information alone. We found a confidence bias favoring the condition in which the prior influenced decisions, even when accounting for performance differences. Computational modeling revealed this effect to best be explained by confidence using the prior-congruent evidence as an additional cue, beyond the posterior evidence used in the perceptual decision. This suggests a confirmatory confidence bias favoring evidence congruent with low-level perceptual priors, revealing that, in line with high-level expectations, even long-term priors have a particularly strong influence at the metacognitive level.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

### The problems the paper attempts to solve This paper attempts to explore how long - term perceptual priors affect human confidence in decision - making. Specifically, the researchers focus on the "slow - motion prior", that is, humans' tendency to think that the movement speed is slower, and how this prior plays a role in perceptual decision - making and confidence judgment. #### Background and motivation 1. **Perceptual decision - making in the Bayesian framework**: - According to the Bayesian framework, our perceptual decision - making and confidence in these decisions are both based on the weighted integration of prior expectations and the precision of incoming sensory information. - The traditional assumption is that the prior has the same influence on decision - making and confidence. 2. **Findings of previous studies**: - However, some studies have shown that the influence of the prior on confidence may be different from that on perceptual decision - making. - These studies mainly focus on high - level probabilistic expectations flexibly induced in the task context, rather than naturally - formed low - level perceptual priors. 3. **Research questions**: - This paper aims to explore whether long - term naturally - formed perceptual priors also show similar asymmetry in confidence judgment. - Specifically, the researchers use the "slow - motion prior" as the experimental object and test this problem through experimental design. #### Experimental design 1. **Experimental conditions**: - **Bias condition**: The slow - motion prior strongly affects the direction of perceptual decision - making. - **No - Bias condition**: Perceptual decision - making is completely driven by stimulus information and is not affected by the prior. 2. **Experimental tasks**: - Participants make two consecutive motion - direction decisions in each trial, and then make a confidence choice. - The confidence choice requires participants to choose the one in which they are more confident among the two decisions. 3. **Data analysis**: - By matching the first - level decision - making behaviors in the two conditions, the researchers can examine whether there is a remaining confidence bias. - Use computational modeling methods to further quantify this effect and understand the mechanism of the role of perceptual priors in confidence judgment. #### Main findings 1. **Confidence bias**: - Even when controlling for performance differences, participants made more confidence choices in the Bias condition, indicating the existence of a confirmatory confidence bias. - This confidence bias supports prior - consistent evidence as an additional cue, beyond the posterior evidence used for perceptual decision - making. 2. **Computational modeling**: - By fitting and comparing different confidence - choice models, the researchers found that the model that best explains this effect is one that incorporates prior - consistent evidence as an additional cue in confidence judgment. ### Conclusion This paper reveals that long - term naturally - formed perceptual priors (such as the slow - motion prior) not only affect perceptual decision - making, but also particularly strongly affect confidence judgment. This indicates that even at the low - level perceptual level, prior information also plays an important role at the metacognitive level.

Long-term perceptual priors drive confidence bias which favors prior-congruent evidence

Prior probability cues bias sensory encoding with increasing task exposure

Long-term priors influence visual perception through recruitment of long-range feedback

Post-decision biases reveal a self-consistency principle in perceptual inference

Priors for natural image statistics inform confidence in perceptual decisions

Metacognitive Introspection Alters the Dynamics of Pre-Decisional Neural Evidence Accumulation

How relevant is the prior? Bayesian causal inference for dynamic perception in volatile environments

Temporal stability of Bayesian belief updating in perceptual decision-making

Perceptual confirmation bias and decision bias underlie adaptation to sequential regularities

Distinct neural markers of evidence accumulation index metacognitive processing before and after simple visual decisions

Confidence Is the Bridge between Multi-stage Decisions

A unifying theory explains seemingly contradictory biases in perceptual estimation

Does perceptual confidence facilitate cognitive control?

Modeling perceptual confidence and the confidence forced-choice paradigm.

Probabilistic vs. non-probabilistic approaches to the neurobiology of perceptual decision-making

Residual Information of Previous Decision Affects Evidence Accumulation in Current Decision

Effects of expectation on face perception and its association with expertise

When temporal attention lacks confidence

Memory reports are biased by all relevant contents of working memory

Evidence for belief updating in decision-variable space: past decisions with finer granularity attract future ones more strongly