Abstract:Forensic anthropology and forensic facial image identification are areas with two aspects in common: (i) the use of anthropological knowledge concerning human variation in their analyses and (ii) low numbers of accredited forensic units. While the low numbers are often explained by the uniqueness of human identification cases, given the high level of scrutiny in the forensic sciences, interest in and efforts to achieve accreditation have become increasingly prominent. Therefore, this study aimed to obtain accreditation-relevant information about the working environment in facial image comparison units by surveying facial examiners across Europe. Two surveys were distributed: One was given to participants of a European Commission-funded training course for technical assessors in facial image comparison, and the second, more comprehensive survey, was distributed to members of the European Network of Forensic Science Institutes Digital Imaging Working Group. Thirty-four responses from facial examiners from 16 countries were received. All respondents worked for a governmental organization, nine (26.5%) in accredited units, and 12 (35.3%) had worked as facial examiners for more than 11 years. More than 80% of respondents had an academic background. All examiners from accredited units reported having standard operating procedures, annual Digital Imaging Working Group proficiency testing, and using a standard methodology (compared with 72%, 92%, and 84% from nonaccredited units, respectively). The survey found that working conditions in forensic facial image identification vary among European countries. Some respondents from nonaccredited units reported that their unit had no standard operating procedures, with proficiency tests and intralaboratory validations not performed regularly, and an inconsistently used standard methodology. As these conditions are typically required for successful accreditation, a better understanding of best practice and accreditation requirements in the field is needed. Facilitating interactions between forensic practitioners and quality managers may prove beneficial for future accreditation efforts. Key points: Survey of European facial examiners focused on accreditation-relevant topics.Respondents from accredited facial image comparison units differed from those of nonaccredited units in terms of better awareness of standard operating procedures, uptake of intra- and interlaboratory testing, and the consistent use of standard methods and regular method validation.A better understanding of accreditation requirements and best practices recommendations would help to harmonize the practice of the forensic sciences related to human identification.

Perceptual Expertise of Forensic Examiners and Reviewers on Tests of Cross‐Race and Disguised Face Identification and Face Memory

Face recognition accuracy of forensic examiners, superrecognizers, and face recognition algorithms

The effect of facial ageing on forensic facial image comparison

Face processing in police service: the relationship between laboratory-based assessment of face processing abilities and performance in a real-world identity matching task

A Robust Method of Measuring Other-Race and Other-Ethnicity Effects: the Cambridge Face Memory Test Format.

The effects of cognitive bias, examiner expertise, and stimulus material on forensic evidence analysis

Diverse types of expertise in facial recognition

The effect of fingerprint expertise on visual short-term memory

Face identification proficiency test designed using item response theory

Information sampling differences supporting superior face identity processing ability

Mock jurors' evaluations of eyewitness identification evidence based on appearance change and associated instructions

EYEWITNESS RECALL AND PHOTO IDENTIFICATION: A FIELD EXPERIMENT

A decision processes account of the differences in the eyewitness confidence-accuracy relationship between strong and weak face recognizers under suboptimal exposure and delay conditions.

Detecting Superior Face Recognition Skills in a Large Sample of Young British Adults

Does presenting perpetrator and innocent suspect faces from different facial angles influence the susceptibility of eyewitness memory? An investigation into the misinformation effect and eyewitness misidentification

Testing a potential alternative to traditional identification procedures: Reaction time-based concealed information test does not work for lineups with cooperative witnesses

Challenges of accreditation in forensic fields concerned with human identification: a survey of European facial examiners

The Doppelgänger Effect? A comparative study of forensic facial depiction methods

Does Cross‐Age Contact Reduce the Cross‐Age Deficit in Younger and Older Adult's Eyewitness Identification Performance?

Application of artificial intelligence to eyewitness identification

Diagnosing Prosopagnosia in East Asian Individuals: Norms for the Cambridge Face Memory Test-Chinese