Abstract:Eye movement strategies employed by humans to identify conspecifics are not universal. Westerners predominantly fixate the eye region during face recognition, whereas Easterners consistently focus more on the nose, yet recognition accuracy is comparable (Blais et al., 2008). However, the face literature has robustly shown that the critical information for face recognition is located in the eyes and partially the mouth, but not the nose. Moreover, since eye movements in natural viewing conditions do not provide unequivocal evidence on the measure of the visual information being used by observers, the question of whether humans universally use similar facial information to recognize faces remains unresolved. To address this issue, we monitored eye movements during face recognition of thirty Western Caucasian (WC) and thirty East Asian (EA) observers with a novel technique that parametrically restricts information outside central vision. We used ‘Spotlights’ with Gaussian apertures of 2°, 5° or 8° dynamically centered on observers' fixations. Face recognition performance improved with increasing Spotlight apertures. Regardless of culture, observers actively fixated the eyes and mouth with constrained Spotlights (2°, 5°). In the 8° condition, information from both eyes and mouth was simultaneously available when fixating the nose and, as expected, only EA observers shifted their fixations towards this region. This central location is optimal to integrate information globally, a cultural marker of Easterners' perceptual strategies. WC observers engage in analytic strategies and their facial feature-by-feature strategy was not affected by Spotlight apertures. Social experience and cultural factors shape the way humans think about the world and regulate the strategies used to extract information from faces. However, these external forces do not modulate the information used to solve this critical biological feat. Human beings rely on identical facial information to recognize conspecifics, a universal law dictated by the evolutionary constraints of nature and not nurture.

Criterion shifting in an unfamiliar face-matching task: Effects of base rates, payoffs, and perceptual discriminability.

Face Recognition Subserves Nature Not Nurture

Mapping Face Recognition Information Use across Cultures.

When East Meets West: Gaze-Contingent Blindspots Abolish Cultural Diversity in Eye Movements for Faces

Social Judgments from Faces Are Universal

Perceptual Processes in the Cross-Race Effect: Evidence From Eyetracking

Methodological improvements for studying face matching in border control tasks

Upshifted decision criteria in attentional blink and repetition blindness

A decision processes account of the differences in the eyewitness confidence-accuracy relationship between strong and weak face recognizers under suboptimal exposure and delay conditions.

The Part Task of the Part-Spacing Paradigm is Not a Pure Measurement of Part-Based Information of Faces.

Test performance in optional shift and configural acquired equivalence are positively correlated.

EXPRESS: Face matching and self-insight: A Registered Report investigating individual differences in metacognitive sensitivity, efficiency, and bias

Automated face recognition assists with low‐prevalence face identity mismatches but can bias users

The Automatic and the Expected Self: Separating Self- and Familiarity Biases Effects by Manipulating Stimulus Probability.

Adapting attentional control settings in a shape-changing environment

Facial misfits accelerate stereotype-based associative learning

Gambling in the visual periphery: a conjoint-measurement analysis of human ability to judge visual uncertainty.

Binocular rivalry reveals differential face processing in congenital prosopagnosia

Perceptual Expertise of Forensic Examiners and Reviewers on Tests of Cross‐Race and Disguised Face Identification and Face Memory

Towards a two-factor approach to the cross-race effect

The role of perceptual similarities in determining the asymmetric mixed-category advantage.