Abstract:Purpose of the study: Because children's own perception, memory and expressive powers differ significantly from those of adults, resulting in a difference between child and adult witnesses, the debate on the competence of the child as a witness has shifted to a judgement on the reliability of the child's testimony in the context of the development of psycho-cognitive science. Methodology: The physiological and psychological characteristics of child witnesses determine their deficiencies in the encoding, storage and extraction of memory information, and therefore the reliability of child testimonies is a key and difficult issue. For this reason, this paper uses documentary analysis to further analyse child witness testimony as the focus of the study. Main Findings: A psychological analysis of the multiple factors that affect the reliability of children's testimony. Two conclusions are drawn: 1. Children are in principle competent to testify. The development of children's testimonial competence leads to the conclusion that even very young children can remember events that happened long ago, especially if they already have prior knowledge about them. 2. Practical guidance for improving the truthfulness of the content of child witness statements improves the reliability of child witness testimony. Children can be influenced in a variety of ways to recount detailed and complete accounts of events that did not occur, such that professionals are unable to distinguish between false and truthful accounts. Perhaps the next step is to improve "questioning techniques". Novelty of the study: Correct and reliable witness testimony is key to the investigation and trial process. The importance of child witness testimony has become increasingly apparent in recent years as the number of cases involving children has increased. This issue has previously only been the focus of jurists, and this study analyses it from a psychological perspective, laying the groundwork for subsequent research in law and psychology.

Investigator Sensitivity to Alibi Witness Inconsistency after a Long Delay

Memory Errors in Alibi Generation: How an Alibi Can Turn Against Us

Partners under Pressure: Examining the Consistency of True and False Alibi Statements

Altruistic Lying in an Alibi Corroboration Context: The Effects of Liking, Compliance, and Relationship between Suspects and Witnesses

Truth-tellers stand the test of time and contradict evidence less than liars, even months after a crime.

"It wasn't me, check the cameras!" Suspects' apparent verifiable responses might not indicate innocence

Alibis: Generation, Consistency, Corroboration, Believability, and Detection - Introduction to this Special Issue

Examining the effects of evidence disclosure timing and strength on information inconsistencies and provision within investigative interviews

Knowledge of legal professionals about age trends in false memory propensity: a vignette study

Imagining a false alibi impairs concealed memory detection with the autobiographical Implicit Association Test.

Mock jurors' evaluations of eyewitness identification evidence based on appearance change and associated instructions

Selective trust: Children's use of intention and outcome of past testimony.

Psychological analysis of child witness testimony

Children's false memory and true disclosure in the face of repeated questions

Idiosyncratic effects of interviewer behavior on the accuracy of children's responses

The importance of consistency in complainants' evidence in the decision to prosecute child sexual abuse cases

Eyewitness confidence in the interviewing context: Understanding the impact of question type and order

Mock Juror Perceptions of Eyewitness Reports Given by Children with Intellectual Disabilities

Convicting with confidence? Why we should not over-rely on eyewitness confidence

Checking out the unexplained: With age, children become increasingly skeptical of surprising claims.

Suggestibility of the child witness: a historical review and synthesis