Abstract:Validly characterizing youth mental health phenomena requires evidence-based approaches to assessment. An evidence-based assessment cannot rely on a "gold standard" instrument but rather, batteries of instruments. These batteries include multiple modalities of instrumentation (e.g., surveys, interviews, performance-based tasks, physiological readings, structured clinical observations). Among these instruments are those that require soliciting reports from multiple informants : People who provide psychometrically sound data about youth mental health (e.g., parents, teachers, youth themselves). The January 2011 issue of the Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology ( JCCAP ) included a Special Section devoted to the most common outcome of multi-informant assessments of youth mental health, namely discrepancies across informants' reports (i.e., informant discrepancies ). The 2011 JCCAP Special Section revolved around a critical question: Might informant discrepancies contain data relevant to understanding youth mental health (i.e., domain-relevant information )? This Special Issue is a "sequel" to the 2011 Special Section. Since 2011, an accumulating body of work indicates that informant discrepancies often contain domain-relevant information. Ultimately, we designed this Special Issue to lay the conceptual, methodological, and empirical foundations of guidelines for integrating multi-informant data when informant discrepancies contain domain-relevant information. In this introduction to the Special Issue, we briefly review the last 12 years of research and theory on informant discrepancies. This review highlights limitations inherent to the most commonly used strategies for integrating multi-informant data in youth mental health. We also describe contributions to the Special Issue, including articles about informant discrepancies that traverse multiple content areas (e.g., autism, implementation science, measurement validation, suicide).

Alibis: Generation, Consistency, Corroboration, Believability, and Detection - Introduction to this Special Issue

Memory Errors in Alibi Generation: How an Alibi Can Turn Against Us

Investigator Sensitivity to Alibi Witness Inconsistency after a Long Delay

Partners under Pressure: Examining the Consistency of True and False Alibi Statements

Altruistic Lying in an Alibi Corroboration Context: The Effects of Liking, Compliance, and Relationship between Suspects and Witnesses

Police perceptions of alibi accounts: the role of intergroup bias

"It wasn't me, check the cameras!" Suspects' apparent verifiable responses might not indicate innocence

Research anomalies in criminology: How serious? How extensive over time? And who was responsible?

Judges and lawyers' beliefs in repression and dissociative amnesia may imperil justice: further guidance required

Analysing Deception in Witness Memory through Linguistic Styles in Spontaneous Language

Will your words become mine? Underlying processes and cowitness intimacy in the memory conformity paradigm.

Making Memories: A Qualitative Exploration of the Impact of False Allegations of Satanic Ritual Abuse

Statistics as a Social Activity: Attitudes toward Amalgamating Evidence

Child Witness Reliability: A Qualitative Exploration of Professional Perceptions

Forensic, clinical and everyday remembering: Exploring the role of perceived audience in changes across autobiographical memory recollections

How do participants feel about the ethics of rich false memory studies?

Imagining a false alibi impairs concealed memory detection with the autobiographical Implicit Association Test.

The effect of confession evidence on conviction, and considering alternative scenarios as remedy in a sample of police officers

Beyond Repressed Memory: Current Alternative Solutions to the Controversy

From understanding to justifying: Computational reliabilism for AI-based forensic evidence evaluation

Introduction to the Special Issue. A Dozen Years of Demonstrating That Informant Discrepancies are More Than Measurement Error: Toward Guidelines for Integrating Data from Multi-Informant Assessments of Youth Mental Health