Abstract:Introduction: Forensic interviewing entails practitioners interviewing suspects to secure valid information and elicit confessions. Such interviews are often conducted in police stations but may also occur in field settings such as border crossings, security checkpoints, bus terminals, and sports venues. Because these real-world interviews often lack experimental control and ground truth, this investigation explored whether results of non-forensic interviews generalize to forensic ones. Methods: Organizational espionage was simulated to determine (1) what verbal signals distinguish truth from deception, (2) whether deception in groups aligns with deception in dyads, and (3) whether non-forensic venues can be generalized to forensic ones. Engaging in a mock hiring deliberation, participants (4–5 strangers) reviewed and discussed resumes of potential candidates. Surreptitiously, two group members assigned the role of "organizational spies" attempted to persuade the group to hire an inferior candidate. Each group member presented notes from an interview of "their" candidate, followed by a discussion of all candidates. Spies were to use any means possible, including deception, to persuade others to select their candidate. A financial incentive was offered for having one's candidate chosen. The interview reports and discussions were transcribed and analyzed with SPLICE, an automated text analysis program. Results: Deceivers were perceived as less trustworthy than truth-tellers, especially when the naïve players won but overall, deceivers were difficult for non-spies to detect even though they were seen as less trustworthy than the naïve participants. Deceivers' language was more complex and exhibited an "echoing" strategy of repeating others' opinions. This collusion evolved naturally, without pre-planning. No other verbal differences were evident, which suggests that the difference between spies and non-spies was subtle and difficult for truth-tellers to spot. Discussion: Whether deception can be successfully detected hinges on a variety of factors including the deceiver's skill to disguise and the detector's ability to sense and process information. Furthermore, the group dynamics and communication context subtly moderate how deception manifests and influence the accuracy of detecting ulterior motives. Our future investigations could encompass non-verbal communication channels and verbal patterns rooted in content, thereby providing a more comprehensive understanding of deception detection.

Analysing Deception in Witness Memory through Linguistic Styles in Spontaneous Language

Detecting lies in investigative interviews through the analysis of response latencies and error rates to unexpected questions

Detecting Deception through Linguistic Analysis

Arabic within culture forensic interviews: Arabic native speaking lay-observer truth and lie accuracy, confidence, and verbal cue selection

Partners under Pressure: Examining the Consistency of True and False Alibi Statements

An empirical evaluation of interpersonal deception theory in a real-world, high-stakes environment

Which Spoken Language Markers Identify Deception in High-Stakes Settings? Evidence From Earnings Conference Calls

Detecting ulterior motives from verbal cues in group deliberations

To Tell The Truth: Language of Deception and Language Models

Altruistic Lying in an Alibi Corroboration Context: The Effects of Liking, Compliance, and Relationship between Suspects and Witnesses

On the Lexical Characteristics of Deception

A multi-dimensional analysis of deception

Text Analysis in Adversarial Settings: Does Deception Leave a Stylistic Trace?

The Electrocortical Signature of Successful and Unsuccessful Deception in a Face-to-Face Social Interaction

Detection of Deception Based on Fmri Activation Patterns Underlying the Production of a Deceptive Response and Receiving Feedback about the Success of the Deception after a Mock Murder Crime.

Neural Dynamics of Deception: Insights from Fmri Studies of Brain States

Cognitive Dissonance: Why Do Language Model Outputs Disagree with Internal Representations of Truthfulness?

Nonverbal cues to deception: insights from a mock crime scenario in a Chinese sample

Complications travel: A cross‐cultural comparison of the proportion of complications as a verbal cue to deceit

How Entangled is Factuality and Deception in German?

Narrative Style and Witness Testimony