Abstract:The article presents a critical analysis of the theories and practices of scientific objectivity and outlines a promising feminist concept of objectivity. The author begins by criticizing two mainstream approaches to a feminist evaluation of scientific objectivity: a social constructionism combining the techniques of semiology and deconstruction, and a feminist empiricism. The former insists on the rhetorical nature of truth existing in the power field of a textualized world, while the latter legitimizes scientific objectivity adjusted for the results of gender analysis to yield a “successor science.” Rehabilitating the metaphor of vision resolves the dichotomy between the historical contingency of knowledge claims and subjects and the trust in scientific explanations of the “real” world. Any vision is embodied and therefore presupposes a location in the world. Consequently, the objectivity sought is inevitably embodied, and knowledge is situated and local, always associated with some place or position. Haraway subscribes to the constructivist critique of disembodied scientific objectivity and adds that it is an example of the “god trick” in which objectivity is a view “from above” or “from nowhere,” from outside the field of particular positions so that the scientist is distanced from the object of research. The point of view — of a human, any living being, or a machine — is an allegory for feminist objectivity. But in contrast to positioning approaches, the objectivity promised does not consist in identification with another position, but rather in a partial connection: to see together with the other, without claiming to be other. Situated knowledge from a partial perspective does not monopolize the truth by ontologizing subjugation but instead opens a way to learn how others see. Thus, only a partial perspective combined with others of the same kind can guarantee objectivity and accountability. However, the shared conversation on which rational knowledge is based should not be limited only to human beings. Any object of knowledge, Haraway argues, even when mediated by technologies for visualization, has agency, is active and is a generative node for meaning. The idea of material-semiotic actors whose boundaries are materialized in social interactions is introduced to conceptualize this kind of agency.

A Feminist Interpretation of Hume on Testimony

Hume's Reductionism of Testimony: Hot Water and Way Out

Testimonial Evidence and Its Definition

A Feminist Perspective

Katherine Mansfield: A Special Feminist-By a Close Reading of A Dill Pickle

Feminist Epistemology in A Polanyian Perspective

On Rational Jurisprudence: A Problem in Bayesian Confirmation Theory

Women, the intellectually humble, and liberals write more persuasive political arguments

Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective

The early Rousseau’s egalitarian feminism: a philosophical convergence with Madame Dupin and ‘The Critique of the Spirit of the Laws’

Feminist Approaches to International Law

David Hume on history, development and happiness: interconnections

Discussion of Husserl's Critique on the Theory of Perception of Hume

Understanding what was said

Ideal Verificationism and Perceptual Faith

Hume on Self-Government and Strength of Mind

Values, standpoints, and scientific/intellectual movements

David Hume’s Notion of Perception and his Problem with Causality

Evidence About Harm: Dual Status Victim Participant Testimony at the International Criminal Court and the Straitjacketing of Narratives About Suffering

Scientific and religious beliefs are primarily shaped by testimony

On Hume's History View of the Pluralistic Mergence