Understanding what was said

Guy Longworth
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-016-1243-5
IF: 1.595
2016-10-12
Synthese
Abstract:On the most prominent account, understanding what was said is always propositional knowledge of what was said. I develop a more minimal alternative, according to which understanding is sometimes a distinctive attitude towards what was said—to a first approximation, entertaining what was said. The propositional knowledge account has been supported on the basis of its capacity to explain testimonial knowledge transmission. I argue that it is not so supported.
history & philosophy of science
What problem does this paper attempt to address?