Abstract:A number of laboratory and clinical studies over the last 15 years have explored the potential advantages of bonding amalgam to tooth surfaces. Bond strengths have been reported to range from 2 to 20 MPa, with higher bond strengths reported for filled adhesives. Most studies agree that the use of bonding results in a considerable reduction of microleakage, when compared with copal varnish or no lining. The use of bonding provides retention in vitro that is equivalent to, or better than, the use of mechanical undercuts. Most studies on strength of restored teeth report an improvement in resistance to fracture or cuspal flexing as measured by strain gauges. Penetration of secondary caries along the interface has been found to be inhibited by bonding. The mode of failure of bonded amalgams has generally been reported to be mixed, but predominantly between the resin and amalgam. In vitro studies have reported one potential problem in the incorporation of resin into amalgam, which may cause a decrease in strength of the restoration. The clinical studies of bonded amalgams that have been published to date are of short duration, indicating that when traditional preparations are used, no problems are seen with bonding, but also no advantages, as measured by clinical assessment criteria. However, some studies show that bonded amalgam may be useful for procedures where non-bonded amalgams would be expected to be lost, namely in preparations with little, if any, mechanical retention. It was concluded that, while there are various in vitro studies demonstrating that bonded amalgams have advantages of improved retention and tooth reinforcement and decreased marginal microleakage and secondary caries, the operative technique is more complicated and there are few advantages yet evident from clinical studies in conventional preparations having mechanical retentive features. However, there is evidence accruing from clinical studies that bonding of amalgam can be favorably used to extend the range of usage of amalgam to non-retentive conservative preparations, and toward the other extreme, as an adjunct to other forms of retention in large compound restorations.

Clinical Evaluation of Bonded Amalgam Restorations Using Two Adhesive Materials

Clinical Evaluation of a Self-Etching Bonding Agent in Preventive Resin Restoration

Three Years Clinical Evaluation of Self-Eching Primer and Composite Resin on Posterior ClassⅠ Restorations

Bond Strength Evaluation of a Self-Adhesive Composite Resin Cement in Vitro

The clinical evaluation for three types of orthodontic bracket bonding cement applied to patients with Angle classⅡmalocclusion and the care

Clinical Effect of Three Filling Methods in Restoration of Proximal-Occlusal Cavity in Molars

[Comparative Study of Three Bonding Methods in Attaching Removable Thermoplastic Appliances].

Observed Clinical Effect of Fill with Clearfil SE-BOND Adhensives and the AP-X Composite Resin

PENETRATION OF AMALGAM CORRODED PRODUCTS INTO DENTIN AND ITS EFFECT ON BONDING USING SELF ETCH ADHESIVE SYSTEM VERSUS RESIN MODIFIED GLASS IONOMER

Evaluation of Self-Adhesive Bonding Resin in Adhensiving Fiber-Post

[Clinical Evaluation of a Two-Step Etch-and-rinse Adhesive and a One-Step Self-Etch Adhesive in Non-Carious Cervical Lesion].

Clinical Evaluation on Restoration of Permanent Molars with Interproximal Caries

The Effect of Different Pre-Treatments on the Enamel Bonding Properties of a Self-Adhesive Resin Cement

Influence of Various Self-etch Adhesives on Interfacial Integrity Restored with Flowable Resin Composite

Bonding of amalgam restorations: existing knowledge and future prospects

A Comparative Evaluation of the Bonding Strength, Marginal Adaptation, and Microleakage of Dental Cements in Prosthodontics: An In Vitro Comparative Study

Bond strengths of the adhesive resin-amalgam interface

Influence of adhesive-composite application modalities on their bonding to tooth structure and resistance of the performed restorations to failure

Shear bond strengths of different types of adhesive resin agents to glass infiltrated alumina oxide ceramic

Comparison of bonding strength in two different designs

Comparison of Atraumatic Restorative Treatment and Conventional Restorative Procedures in A Hospital Clinic: Evaluation after 30 Months