Three Years Clinical Evaluation of Self-Eching Primer and Composite Resin on Posterior ClassⅠ Restorations

姬爱平,路文阁,高学军,叶荣
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1003-7632.2007.04.007
2007-01-01
Abstract:Objective To evaluate the clinical effects of self-eching primer and composite resin on posterior ClassⅠrestorations.Methods Seventy molars with medium to deep caries from 23 patients (6 males, 17 females) were divided into two groups. The experimental group: 36 cases were restored with Clearifil SE bond (self etching bond) + Clearfil AP-X (hybrid composite); The control group: 34 cases were restored with Prime Bond NT(total etching dentin adhesive) + Esthet-X(packable composite). The restorations were assessed after placement at 1 week, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years and 3 years to check post-operative sensitivity, color match, anatomic form, marginal adaptation and secondary caries according to Rege's criteria.Results Post-operative sensitivity of molars was not present in the experimental group, only 1 case had temporary sensitivity after 1 week in the control group. There was no significant difference between two groups on sensitivity (P0.05). Color match of restorations in both groups had Bravo grade appeared at different stages, no case was scored as Charlie. Eighteen restorations were scored as Bravo in the experimental group and 6 in the control group during 3 years. The results of color match of 1 year and 2 years between the experimental group and the control group had statistically significant differentes (P0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups at anatomic form, marginal adaptation and secondary caries (P0.05), all of them were considered well.Conclusion This study showed that using two different types of adhesive and different composite resin on posterior classⅠ restorations could get satisfied clinical results, the color stability of packable composite resin was better than hybrid composite resin.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?