Abstract:The aim of the present study was to evaluate the three-year clinical performance of a nanofilled resin composite, a packable resin composite, and silorane-based resin restorations in Class I occlusal cavities. Twenty-eight patients with at least three similar-sized occlusal lesions in molar teeth participated in the study. A total of 84 Class I occlusal restorations were placed: 28 with nanofilled resin composite (Filtek Supreme), 28 with packable resin composite (P60), and 28 with silorane-based resin (Filtek Silorane). Filtek Supreme and P60 were used with their respective etch-and-rinse adhesive system, Adper Single Bond 2, and Filtek Silorane was used with its respective self-etch adhesive, Filtek Silorane Adhesive. All restorations were placed by the same operator. The restorations were evaluated at baseline, at six months, and annually for three years according to modified US Public Health Service criteria by two calibrated examiners who did not know which restorative resin had been used. The three restorative materials for each category were compared using the χ (2) test at a significance level of 0.05. Cochran's Q test was used to compare the changes across the five time points for each restorative material. McNemar's test followed by Bonferroni adjustment was used when significance differences were found. At the end of the three years, 60 restorations were evaluated in 20 patients, with a recall rate of 71.4%. The retention rate was 100% for all restorative resins. Eight restorations from the P60 group, ten from the Filtek Supreme group, and nine from the Filtek Silorane group were rated Bravo for marginal discoloration. For marginal adaptation, three P60, five Filtek Supreme, and 11 Filtek Silorane restorations were rated Bravo. No statistically significant differences in overall clinical performance were found between the restorative materials except for marginal adaptation. P60 showed the best marginal adaptation at the end of the three years. No differences were observed between the restorative resins for any of the evaluation criteria tested (p>0.05). None of the restorations showed postoperative sensitivity, secondary caries, or loss of anatomic form. All restorative resins performed equally well in clinical conditions during the three-year evaluation, and no significant differences were found among them, except for marginal adaptation, in which P60 showed superior results.

Clinical Effect of Three Filling Methods in Restoration of Proximal-Occlusal Cavity in Molars

The effect of occlusal interference on the restoration of the idiopathic cervical lesions

Clinical Evaluation on Restoration of Permanent Molars with Interproximal Caries

Clinical Evaluation of Bonded Amalgam Restorations Using Two Adhesive Materials

Clinical evaluation of endodontically treated molars restored with amalgam or composite

The Stress Analysis on Filling and Full Crown Restoration of the Structure Defect of the First Mandibular Molar

Clinical effect of three kinds of fiber post for posterior teeth restoration

Clinical trial of restoration of deep dental wedge-shaped defects with three different methods

Three Years Clinical Evaluation of Self-Eching Primer and Composite Resin on Posterior ClassⅠ Restorations

Clinical Effect of Treatment of Primary Molar Teeth with Extensive Defect Using Prefabricated Metal Crowns

The improvement of clinical curative effect on senile root caries by using resin-modified glass-ionomer

Clinical Evaluation of SonicFill Bulk Resin Technique in the Restoration of Proximal Deep Caries of Primary Molars: a Two-Year Randomized Controlled Trial

Clinical Evaluation of a Self-Etching Bonding Agent in Preventive Resin Restoration

Evaluation on clinical effect of cast pure titanium split post crown restoration of molars with low occlusogingival distance and large root furcation

[Three Years Retrospective Clinical Evaluation of Endodontically Treated Premolars Restored by Cast Ceramic Onlays].

Three-year clinical evaluation of different restorative resins in class I restorations

The Clinical Curative Analysis of 3M FiltekTMZ350 XT for Repairing Moderate and Severe Dental Fluorosis Wedge-Shaped Defect

Influence of Cavity Lining on the 3-Year Clinical Outcome of Posterior Composite Restorations: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Clinical evaluation of direct resin composite restorations of endodontically treated molars using dual cured self-adhesive system with bulk fill composite versus incremental packing technique

Assessment of bonded amalgam cores in preserving elderly patients' endodontically treated posterior teeth

Comparison of Atraumatic Restorative Treatment and Conventional Restorative Procedures in A Hospital Clinic: Evaluation after 30 Months