The clinical evaluation for three types of orthodontic bracket bonding cement applied to patients with Angle classⅡmalocclusion and the care

XU Ping-ying,NA Bin,LIN Yu-ting,PENG Juan-hong
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1674-4985.2010.20.054
2010-01-01
Abstract:Objective To compare the clinical application of orthodontic bracket bonding cement.Methods 30 patients with Angle classⅡmalocclusion were randomly divided into 3 groups,group A using Jinjing enamel adhesives,group B using 3M chem-cure adhesives,group C using light-cured glass ionomer adhesive.Three groups' bracket bonding failure rate,the clinical operation time,as well as the degree of enamel demineralization were recorded.Results This gave bracket bonding failure rate of 20.4%for group A,5.4%for group B,4.6%for group C.Statistical analysis the bracket bonding failure rate of Jinjing enamel adhesives is significantly difference with 3M chem-cure adhesives and light-cured glass ionomer adhesive.(x~2 value of 21.64 and 24.13,P <0.01),the latter two groups have no statistically significant difference.(X~2= 1.97,P>0.05).Doctors'operable time for light-cured glass ionomer adhesive was longest and tooth demineralization of light -cured glass ionomer adhesive group was less than the other two groups.Conclusion The light-cured glass ionomer adhesive had strong adhesion,a long operable time and the low rate of demineralization.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?