Comparative Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength, Enamel Microfracture, and Adhesive Remnant Index of APC Flash-Free System Versus Traditional Bonding: An In-Vitro Study
Alok Ranjan,Waseem Khan,Poonam Achalkar,Ankita Pawar,Dilip Makdum,Viraj Kharkhar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.60928
2024-05-23
Cureus
Abstract:Introduction: In orthodontics, shear bond strength plays an important role because it provides a good bond between the brackets and tooth surface; it avoids fracture of the tooth surface and prevents debonding of brackets from the tooth surface. All of these allow sufficient treatment time. Many factors, including the adhesive, its thickness, its strength, the bonding procedure, the clinician's ability, the base design, the geometry of the bracket, the material, and the kind of bracket all contribute to the shear bond strength. Brackets joined using conventional adhesive and adhesive pre-coated (APC) flash-free glue were the subjects of this comparison and evaluation research, which aimed to measure shear bond strength, enamel microfracture, and adhesive residual index. Method: 60 recently removed premolars from humans were used in this investigation. Before mounting on the acrylic block, the teeth were meticulously cleaned and preserved in artificial saliva. Two groups were formed from the collected premolars the control group and the experimental group. For the control group, we used American Orthodontics (AO) Master/Mini Master series brackets glued with resin composite kits. To make sure the adhesive was uniformly thick, we flashed extra adhesive around the brackets. In the meantime, samples were bonded using 3M Unitek APC flash-free technology in the experimental group. Results: The research indicated that there was a statistically significant difference between the two groups to the adhesive remnant index (ARI) and mean shear bond strength. The shear bond strength of the experimental group averaged 10.96 megapascals (MPa), whereas the control group's was 5.70 MPa. The control group's ARI score was 2.97, whereas the experimental group's score was 2.4. There was no statistically significant change seen in enamel microfracture. Conclusion: A more robust shear bond may be possible using APC flash-free brackets. Compared to conventional bonding techniques and brackets, APC flash-free brackets have a lower adhesive residual index. The APC flash-free bracket technology also causes more enamel microfracture than conventional bonding and bracketing methods.