Abstract:Background: Orthodontic treatment has gained popularity since beginning of era of dentistry. Now a day, everyone is conscious about their appearance, smile and function. During orthodontic treatment use of brackets and adhesives are common. The bonding of brackets will cause demineralization which requires the fluoridation. So the study has been under- taken to analyze the pattern of fluoride release by commercially available adhesive bonding material for the prevention of demineralization. Aim: To evaluate and compare the clinical significance of quantity and pattern of fluoride release from three commercially available adhesives. Objectives: To assess the pattern of fluoride release and quantity, to reduce the decalcification of enamel around orthodontic brackets and bands during treatment and to prevent further use of topical fluoride both office and self-use agents for prevention of demineralization/for remineralization. Materials and methods: The comparison of quantity and pattern of fluoride release study involved commercially available bonding adhesives. They are: Group I--resin reinforced glass Ionomer light cure material (OrthoLC), Group II--fluoride releasing composite resin material (Excel) and Group III--conventional composite (Relay-a-bond) evaluated on 78 freshly extracted premolar teeth divided into three groups consisting 26 specimens in each group. The prepared specimens were stored in artificial saliva at 37°C in an incubator for subsequent fluoride analysis using ORION ion selective electrode coupled with ionalyzer 901. Fluoride analysis made at 24 hours intervals for first 3 consecutive days and thereafter at the end of 10th, 17th, 24th and 31st day of bonding. The data obtained were tabulated and interpreted by statistical analysis using 't' test and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Observations and results: The quantity of fluoride release in groups I and II was significant even at the end of 31st day. The one-way AVOVA showed intra and inter group significance in the quantity of fluoride release. But group III with zero fluoride release with significant decalcification on enamel which requires external use of topical fluorides. The pattern of fluoride released was 3.06 ppm for group I and 2.01 ppm for group II and was declined sharply after 24 hours; and continued to decline in subsequent weeks. Mean quantity of fluoride release by group I was 15.08 ppm were as group II was 9.02 ppm over the test period of 31 days. At the end of 31st day the group I bonding adhesive was releasing considerable amount of fluoride compared to group II whereas group III was nil. At all the periods inter and intra group mean values were highly significant. And group III acted as base line or control group as it was non-fluoride releasing material. Conclusion: Both the fluoride releasing adhesive bond material are useful to reduce the risk of demineralization and further prevent the usage of topical fluoride application and reduce cost and clinical visiting time for both patient and clinician.

Efficacy of New Adhesion Promoters on Compromised Hypocalcified Enamel

Comparative Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength, Enamel Microfracture, and Adhesive Remnant Index of APC Flash-Free System Versus Traditional Bonding: An In-Vitro Study

In vitro Analysis of Shear Bond Strength and Adhesive Remnant Index of Stainless Steel Brackets with Different Adhesive Systems to Enamel.

Evalution of shear bond strength of brackets bonded using different hydrophobic and hydrophilic adhesives: An invitro study

Optimal Enamel Conditioning Strategy for Rebonding Orthodontic Brackets: a Laboratory Study.

Enamel Deproteinization or Sandblasting for Enamel Reconditioning Before Acid Etching to Enhance the Shear Bond Strength of Metallic Brackets in a Third Bonding: An In Vitro Study

Effect of Preventive Dental Products on Bonding Force: An in vitro Study

Evaluation and comparison of shear bond strength of all surface bonding primer with a conventional primer using two different materials of brackets bonded to different surfaces: An in vitro study

Evaluation and comparison of quantity and pattern of fluoride release from orthodontic adhesives: an in vitro study

Influence of etchant type on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets to enamel

Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength and Adhesive Remnant Index of New-Generation Adhesive-Coated Bracket Systems In Comparison With Traditional Systems

Comparison of shear bond strength of rebonded stainless steel brackets with three different enamel surface conditioning methods

Effect of enamel deproteinization with 5.25% sodium hypochlorite on the bond strength of orthodontic brackets. An experimental study

Enamel deproteinization before acid etching and its effect on the shear bond strength--an in vitro study

Comparison of a recently developed nanofiller self-etching primer adhesive with other self-etching primers and conventional acid etching

Effect of Different Primers on the Shear Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets Bonded to Reinforced Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) Substrate

Bond Strength, Microleakage, Microgaps, and Marginal Adaptation of Self-adhesive Resin Composites to Tooth Substrates with and without Preconditioning with Universal Adhesives

Experimental Bracket Design Performance on Bonding and Polymerization of Orthodontic Composite

An ex vivo investigation into the bond strength of orthodontic brackets and adhesive systems

Comparative analysis of bond strength and microleakage of newer generation bonding agents to enamel and dentin: An in vitro study

The effect of surface treatments of tooth on the shear bond strength of direct composite veneers: An in vitro scanning electron microscope study