Abstract:In the case of fraud, deception is an objective component, but its content and scope are not easily predictable. Jurisprudence expands the scope of deception by stating that all acts that are contrary to the good faith and sincerity are included in its scope. In discussing the establishment of the fraud by omission, precedents and theories that seek the basis for the duty to act in the principle of good faith are being criticized a lot. It is understandable that it is a realistic limitation that it is impossible to make all the circumstances and contents of the obligation to act as a component. Article 18 of the Criminal Law needs to be specified as a provision corresponding to the fulfillment of the elements of omission and the need for legislation to add a provision for arbitrarily reducing the penalty according to the degree of illegality of the omission. The jurisprudence suggests as a criterion for judging whether the duty to inform is violated or not. The principle of good faith and sincerity is abstract and ambiguous regulation. There have been many changes in the real estate transaction situation these days compared to the past. In consideration of the changed real estate transaction, whether the party acknowledges the violation of the duty to inform must be applied and interpreted differently. In this regard, this paper presents the opinion that a limited determination of fraud by omission should be made in consideration of the duty to inform and the duty of confirmation of the other party as well. Eventually, fraud by omission must be limitedly convicted.

Judicial Establishment for Several Knotty Problems on Newly-Appeared Briberies

Reconsideration of Distribution of Liabilities of Crime Committed by an Entity

Public Cases, Authentication Opinions, and Amendments to Law of Criminal Procedure

Issues on Recognition of the Official Crime in the Restructuring of State-owned Enterprises

On the Independence of Commercial Bribery Crime

Judicial Determination of a New Type of Bribery:In the Light of Designating “People v.Pan Yumei and Chen Ning”as a Guiding Case

Reconsideration and Reconstruction of the Mechanism of Controlling Commercial Bribery Crime

A New Discussion of Bribery after Comparative Analysis

The Decoding about Some Problems on Bribery Crime of Influence

On the Innovation of Control Mechanism of the Commercial Bribery

Legal Theory of Multiple Transaction for Special Movable Properties——Commenting onArticle 10 of the Judicial Interpretation of Contract of Sales by Supreme People’s Court

Difficulties of the Notary System Reform in China's Transitional Period:A Case Study of the Legal Notarization of Real Estate Property Rights

On “Transfer of Rational Price” Procured by Kindness

On the Range Expansion of the Main Bodies of Commercial Bribery Crime in Legislation

Re-Exploration on the Requirements of Validity on the Change of the Real Right of Movables

On the Persistent Effect Mechanism of Commercial Bribery Crime Controlling

On Application Scope of Judicial Interpretation over New Forms of Bribery

On Rule of Distribution of Evidential Burden in Criminal Private Prosecution Cases of Intellectual Property Right

Analysis of Objective Problems in the Elements of the Crime of Fraud on Commercial Instruments

Dogmatics on the Criminal Law relating to the Fraud by omission: Focusing on the duty to inform in the Fraud which is non-obligatory Property Crime

On Hold in Property Crimes