Article 106 of Real Right Law:the Foundation of an Interpretative Theory
Ye Jinqiang
2010-01-01
Abstract:In order to interpret appropriately Article 106 of the Real Right Law,it is necessary to ascertain the doctrine behind it,make sure the relationship between public reliance and bona fide acquisition,and confirm the relevance of the concepts among publicizing,public reliance and public reliance intensity.The provision of Article 106 is based on the reliance principle,which determines the consistency of the basic structure of real estate bona fide acquisition and chattel bona fide acquisition.Meanwhile,there are some divergent details of real estate bona fide acquisition and chattel bona fide acquisition,which depend only on the different public reliance intensity of register and possession and their different abilities to show the existence of real rights.Public reliance and bona fide acquisition are two aspects of one thing,that is,both real estate bona fide acquisition and chattel bona fide acquisition are the reflection of public reliance. However,in German law,real estate bona fide acquisition and chattel bona fide acquisition are provided separately in different provisions and based on different principles,so they have different legal structures.The public reliance of real estate register is regarded absolute in German law.Such an absolute public reliance notion and the discrete protection model of chattel and real estate transaction security are inappropriate in its value judgment.In Chinese civil law,both of the register and possession are entitled with public reliance,and the intensity of the former is stronger than that of the latter.Chinese law does not adopt the theory of absolute public reliance, the real estate bona fide acquisition and chattel bona fide acquisition are stipulated in one clause of the Real Right Law (Article 106),and they are established according to an uniformed doctrine. These are reasonable choices.The public reliance intensity has various representations in diverse transaction backgrounds and fields,and it is fluctuating continuously and is specified ultimately in the given case by the influence arising from the degree of imputation and the reasonableness of reliance.