Abstract:Cultural comparison has challenged people’s assumptions of universality in psychology. It has also revealed that many questions and approaches in psychology are not culture-free, but reflect a distinctively Western analytic framework. In this framework, the world is assumed to operate by discernible and stable rules, contradiction is a problem to be resolved, and entities are viewed as relatively independent agents. Context and relationships between people and objects are relatively downplayed—or, when they are examined, are assumed to operate under parsimonious rules. Dialectical or holistic thinking, a framework more prevalent in East Asian societies, involves greater attention to context and relationships, assumptions of change rather than stasis, and acceptance of contradiction. Analytic thinking is useful for science and daily life. But sometimes dialectical thinking results in more accurate conclusions or pragmatically useful decisions than analytic thinking. Therefore, we propose that both dialectical and analytic thinking should be consciously adopted as tools in the “cognitive toolbox” of researchers and laypeople alike. In the present article, we review the cross-cultural work demonstrating the psychological differences that analytic versus dialectical thinking produce. We then consider the strengths of each type of thinking and how they may serve complementary functions for problem solving.

Culture, dialectics, and reasoning about contradiction.

The Dialectic Nature of the Activities in Science and Technology:the Unity of Reason and Unreason

Cultural Differences in Expectations of Change and Tolerance for Contradiction: A Decade of Empirical Research

Contextual and Cultural Differences in Positive Thinking

Culture Changes How We Think About Thinking: From “Human Inference” to “Geography of Thought”

A Quantitative Study of Face Negotiation Behaviors in Intercultural Conflicting Context

Explanations for cultural differences in thinking: Easterners’ dialectical thinking and Westerners’ linear thinking

Problem Finding and Contradiction: Examining the Relationship Between Naive Dialectical Thinking, Ethnicity, and Creativity

The Dialectical Self-Concept: Contradiction, Change, and Holism in East Asian Cultures.

Comparing American and Chinese negotiating styles: The influence of logic paradigms

I Am Against Us? Unpacking Cultural Differences in Ingroup Favoritism Via Dialecticism.

Dialecticism and the Co-occurrence of Positive and Negative Emotions Across Cultures

Culture and Systems of Thought: Comparison of Holistic and Analytic Cognition

Culturally based lay beliefs as a tool for understanding intergroup and intercultural relations

Culture and Systems of Thought: Holistic Versus Analytic Cognition

The Yin and Yang of Attitudes and Related Constructs

Dialectical Self-Esteem and East-West Differences in Psychological Well-Being.

Reasoning in Social Settings

Of Mice and Culture: How Beliefs About Knowing Affect Habits of Thinking

What Is Dialectical Thinking? Conceptualization and Measurement

A Cross-Cultural Analysis of Argument Predispositions in China: Argumentativeness, Verbal Aggressiveness, Argument Frames, and Personalization of Conflict