Abstract:Purpose With rising globalization, Western and Eastern brands are increasingly collaborating and co-branding. Drawing on the theory of dialectical self that captures the degree of cognitive tendency to tolerate conflicts, inconsistencies and ambiguities in self-concept, this paper investigates the effect of consumer dialectical self on co-branding that encompasses Western and East Asian cultural brand personality traits. Design/methodology/approach Two studies were conducted using Chinese participants to examine the effects of the dialectical self on co-brand evaluation under single-and dual-personality conditions and to explore the mediating role of ideal social self-congruence and the moderating role of product type (high vs low conspicuous). Findings The findings suggest that counterintuitive to the received wisdom, the dialectical self negatively influences one's attitude towards a co-brand in the dual-personality condition only. Further, ideal social self-congruence mediates the relationship between the dialectical self and dual-personality co-brand evaluation in the high conspicuous product condition only. Practical implications Important implications are offered to international marketing managers for managing the dialectical self that lead to positive co-brand evaluations. Moreover, managers should highlight ideal social self-congruence for co-branding success for particular product types. Originality/value This paper examines co-branding from a novel perspective of consumer dialectical self and shows the pivotal role it plays when brands carry varying cultural traits engage in co-branding. By identifying the role of the dialectical self and the important mediator and moderator, the paper fulfils an important gap in co-branding literature and offers key implications.

Dialectical Self-Esteem and East-West Differences in Psychological Well-Being.

Culture and Implicit Self-Esteem

Culture and Implicit Self-Esteem: Chinese Are "Good" and "Bad" at the Same Time

The Dialectical Self-Concept: Contradiction, Change, and Holism in East Asian Cultures.

A longitudinal-experimental test of the panculturality of self-enhancement: Self-enhancement promotes psychological well-being both in the west and the east

Explaining self-esteem differences between Chinese and North Americans: Dialectical self (vs. self-consistency) or lack of positive self-regard

Contextual and Cultural Differences in Positive Thinking

Culture, dialectics, and reasoning about contradiction.

Control Deprivation and Styles of Thinking

Cultural Differences in Self-Verification: the Role of Naïve Dialecticism

The Structure of Self-esteem and Its Relation to Psychological Adjustment: A Perspective From Differentiation/integration

Dialecticism and the Co-occurrence of Positive and Negative Emotions Across Cultures

Self-Esteem And Culture: Differences In Cognitive Self-Evaluations Or Affective Self-Regard?

The role of dialectical self and bicultural identity integration in psychological adjustment.

Collaboration between East and West: influence of consumer dialectical self on attitude towards co-brand personality traits

Examining Cultural Differences in How Loneliness is Associated with Psychological Ill-Being Through Social Problem Solving: Does How You Perceive Problems Matter More Than How You Tackle Them?

Chinese People's Implicit Dialectical Self: Results Base on IAT Measure

Cultural Differences in Expectations of Change and Tolerance for Contradiction: A Decade of Empirical Research

Cultural Similarities in Self-Esteem Functioning: East is East and West is West, But Sometimes the Twain do Meet

Situational Differences in Dialectical Emotions: Boundary Conditions in A Cultural Comparison of North Americans and East Asians

Explaining East-West Differences in the Likelihood of Making Favorable Self-Evaluations: the Role of Evaluation Apprehension and Directness of Expression