Abstract:Effective cross-cultural negotiations between firms in the United States and China have become increasingly important as commerce between these two nations continues its rapid expansion. Previous research has explored some of the cultural factors that shape Chinese negotiating styles, making comparisons with American practices. However, scant attention has been paid to differences in perspectives that derive from fundamental logic paradigms, which tend to vary greatly between individuals from the East and West. We outline the primary features of two widely recognized logic frameworks—formal logic (which excludes contradictory notions about a concept or entity) and dialectic logic (which emphasizes contradiction and acknowledges the value of conflict between opposing ideas). Recognizing that formal logic is more common in the United States and that dialectic logic tends to dominate thought in China, we outline hypothesized influences of each logic paradigm on negotiating approaches in the two countries. Combining these insights with those derived from research on other relevant factors, we offer practical suggestions for managing interactions between American and Chinese negotiators. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Comparing American and Chinese negotiating styles: The influence of logic paradigms