Abstract:Logical reasoning consistently plays a fundamental and significant role in the domains of knowledge engineering and artificial intelligence. Recently, Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as a noteworthy innovation in natural language processing (NLP). However, the question of whether LLMs can effectively address the task of logical reasoning, which requires gradual cognitive inference similar to human intelligence, remains unanswered. To this end, we aim to bridge this gap and provide comprehensive evaluations in this paper. Firstly, to offer systematic evaluations, we select fifteen typical logical reasoning datasets and organize them into deductive, inductive, abductive and mixed-form reasoning settings. Considering the comprehensiveness of evaluations, we include 3 early-era representative LLMs and 4 trending LLMs. Secondly, different from previous evaluations relying only on simple metrics (e.g., \emph{accuracy}), we propose fine-level evaluations in objective and subjective manners, covering both answers and explanations, including \emph{answer correctness}, \emph{explain correctness}, \emph{explain completeness} and \emph{explain redundancy}. Additionally, to uncover the logical flaws of LLMs, problematic cases will be attributed to five error types from two dimensions, i.e., \emph{evidence selection process} and \emph{reasoning process}. Thirdly, to avoid the influences of knowledge bias and concentrate purely on benchmarking the logical reasoning capability of LLMs, we propose a new dataset with neutral content. Based on the in-depth evaluations, this paper finally forms a general evaluation scheme of logical reasoning capability from six dimensions (i.e., \emph{Correct}, \emph{Rigorous}, \emph{Self-aware}, \emph{Active}, \emph{Oriented} and \emph{No hallucination}). It reflects the pros and cons of LLMs and gives guiding directions for future works.

Models of Reasoning in Ancient China

Models of Reasoning in Ancient China

Culture, dialectics, and reasoning about contradiction.

Distinctions, Judgment, and Reasoning in Classical Chinese Thought

Reasoning in Social Settings

Thinking through Sets: Exploring How Chinese Pictographic Language Shapes Chinese Logic

On Interdisciplinary Studies of a New Generation of Artificial Intelligence and Logic

A Survey of Reasoning with Foundation Models

Mencius’s Strategies of Political Argumentation

Problems of Inconsistency and Argumentation Logics

Non-monotonic Reasoning and Argumentation System

Argumentation-Based Non-Monotonic Reasoning of Agents

Modeling Non-Monotonic Properties under Propositional Argumentation

Modeling Reasoning in a Social Setting

On Logical Analysis of Evaluating a Real Argument in Everyday Life

Value-based Practical Reasoning: Modal Logic + Argumentation

A Model of Reasoning about Knowledge

Keeping Balance Between Loyalty and Modification: a Toulminian Model As Analytical Framework

A Model-Theoretic Semantics for Two-Sided Argumentation.

Knowledge, Belief and Counterfactual Reasoning in Games

Are Large Language Models Really Good Logical Reasoners? A Comprehensive Evaluation and Beyond