Cultural Differences in Attitudes Toward Action and Inaction: The Role of Dialecticism
Ethan Zell,Rong Su,Hong Li,Moon-Ho Ringo Ho,Sungjin Hong,Tarcan Kumkale,Sarah D Stauffer,Gregory Zecca,Huajian Cai,Sonia Roccas,Javier Arce-Michel,Cristina de Sousa,Rolando Diaz-Loving,Maria Mercedes Botero,Lucia Mannetti,Claudia Garcia,Pilar Carrera,Amparo Cabalero,Masatake Ikemi,Darius Chan,Allan Bernardo,Fernando Garcia,Inge Brechan,Greg Maio,Dolores Albarracín
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550612468774
Abstract:The current research examined whether nations differ in their attitudes toward action and inaction. It was anticipated that members of dialectical East Asian societies would show a positive association in their attitudes toward action/inaction. However, members of non-dialectical European-American societies were expected to show a negative association in their attitudes toward action/inaction. Young adults in 19 nations completed measures of dialectical thinking and attitudes toward action/inaction. Results from multi-level modeling showed, as predicted, that people from high dialecticism nations reported a more positive association in their attitudes toward action and inaction than people from low dialecticism nations. Furthermore, these findings remained after controlling for cultural differences in individualism-collectivism, neuroticism, gross-domestic product, and response style. Discussion highlights the implications of these findings for action/inaction goals, dialecticism, and culture.