Abstract:Purpose With rising globalization, Western and Eastern brands are increasingly collaborating and co-branding. Drawing on the theory of dialectical self that captures the degree of cognitive tendency to tolerate conflicts, inconsistencies and ambiguities in self-concept, this paper investigates the effect of consumer dialectical self on co-branding that encompasses Western and East Asian cultural brand personality traits. Design/methodology/approach Two studies were conducted using Chinese participants to examine the effects of the dialectical self on co-brand evaluation under single-and dual-personality conditions and to explore the mediating role of ideal social self-congruence and the moderating role of product type (high vs low conspicuous). Findings The findings suggest that counterintuitive to the received wisdom, the dialectical self negatively influences one's attitude towards a co-brand in the dual-personality condition only. Further, ideal social self-congruence mediates the relationship between the dialectical self and dual-personality co-brand evaluation in the high conspicuous product condition only. Practical implications Important implications are offered to international marketing managers for managing the dialectical self that lead to positive co-brand evaluations. Moreover, managers should highlight ideal social self-congruence for co-branding success for particular product types. Originality/value This paper examines co-branding from a novel perspective of consumer dialectical self and shows the pivotal role it plays when brands carry varying cultural traits engage in co-branding. By identifying the role of the dialectical self and the important mediator and moderator, the paper fulfils an important gap in co-branding literature and offers key implications.

The Yin and Yang of Attitudes and Related Constructs

Culture, dialectics, and reasoning about contradiction.

Contextual and Cultural Differences in Positive Thinking

Dialecticism and the Co-occurrence of Positive and Negative Emotions Across Cultures

What Is Dialectical Thinking? Conceptualization and Measurement

Cultural Differences in Expectations of Change and Tolerance for Contradiction: A Decade of Empirical Research

The Dialectical Self-Concept: Contradiction, Change, and Holism in East Asian Cultures.

Dialectical Self-Esteem and East-West Differences in Psychological Well-Being.

Collaboration between East and West: influence of consumer dialectical self on attitude towards co-brand personality traits

The Moderating Role of Dialecticism in Consumer Responses to Product Information

I Am Against Us? Unpacking Cultural Differences in Ingroup Favoritism Via Dialecticism.

Expecting the Worst: Moderating Effects of Social Cynicism on the Relationships Between Relationship Conflict and Negative Affective Reactions

Control Deprivation and Styles of Thinking

Culturally based lay beliefs as a tool for understanding intergroup and intercultural relations

Cultural Differences in Attitudes Toward Action and Inaction: The Role of Dialecticism

Cultural Differences in Mixed Emotions: The Role of Dialectical Thinking

Perceiving multiple truths: Does dialectical thinking harmonize colourblind and multicultural ideals?

The role of dialectical self and bicultural identity integration in psychological adjustment.

Chinese People's Implicit Dialectical Self: Results Base on IAT Measure

Situational Differences in Dialectical Emotions: Boundary Conditions in A Cultural Comparison of North Americans and East Asians

Do Experiences Studying Abroad Promote Dialectical Thinking? Empirical Evidence From Chinese International Students