Abstract:Background & aims: Serrated lesions are an important contributor to colorectal cancer (CRC), notably in the proximal colon. Findings in the distal colorectum are markers of advanced proximal adenomatous neoplasia. However, it is not known whether they affect the odds of advanced proximal serrated lesions. Methods: We performed a retrospective cross-sectional study of data from 1910 patients (59.3 ± 8.0 years, 53.8% female) who underwent an average-risk screening colonoscopy from August 2005 through April 2012 at Indiana University Hospital and an associated ambulatory surgery center. Colonoscopies were performed by an endoscopist with high rates of detection of adenomas and serrated polyps. Tissue samples of all serrated polyps (hyperplastic, sessile serrated adenoma/polyp [SSA/P], or traditional serrated adenoma) proximal to the sigmoid colon and serrated polyps >5 mm in the rectum or sigmoid colon were reviewed by a gastrointestinal pathologist and reclassified on the basis of World Health Organization criteria. Advanced serrated lesion (ASL) was defined as SSA/P with cytologic dysplasia, SSA/P ≥10 mm, or traditional serrated adenoma. Advanced conventional adenomatous neoplasia (ACN) was defined as tubular adenoma ≥10 mm, villous histology, high-grade dysplasia, or cancer. The prevalence of proximal ASL and ACN was calculated on the basis of distal colorectal findings. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the age-adjusted and sex-adjusted odds of advanced proximal adenomatous and serrated lesions. Secondary analyses were performed to examine the effect of variable ASL definitions. Results: Fifty-two patients (2.7%) had proximal ASL, and 99 (5.2%) had proximal ACN. Of the 52 patients with proximal ASL, 27 (52%) had no distal polyps. Of the 99 patients with proximal ACN, 40 (40%) had no distal polyps. Age and type of distal adenomas were significantly associated with proximal ACN. There were no significant associations between distal polyp type and proximal ASL. In secondary analyses, distal SSA/Ps (P = .008) but not distal hyperplastic polyps or conventional adenomas were associated with any proximal SSA/P. Conclusions: The findings at flexible sigmoidoscopy that traditionally serve as indications for colonoscopy (conventional adenomas) are likely to be ineffective for detection of proximal ASL. This finding, plus the observation that most patients with proximal ASL have no distal polyps, favors screening colonoscopy over sigmoidoscopy, especially in the elderly. The observation that non-advanced distal SSA/Ps are associated with any proximal SSA/P warrants further study.

S332 Prevalence and Clinical Characteristics of Serrated Adenomas at Screening Colonoscopy in Rural Georgians

Serrated Polyps at CT Colonography: Prevalence and Characteristics of the Serrated Polyp Spectrum

S912 The Link Between Trainee Participation in Colonoscopy Procedures and Quality Metrics

Utilization of Colonoscopy and Pathology Reports for Identifying Patients Meeting the World Health Organization Criteria for Serrated Polyposis Syndrome

Rates of synchronous advanced neoplasia and colorectal cancer in patients with colonic serrated lesions

Rate of detection of serrated lesions at colonoscopy in an average-risk population: a meta-analysis of 129,001 individuals

Patient and Physician Factors Associated with Adenoma and Sessile Serrated Lesion Detection Rates

Findings in the distal colorectum are not associated with proximal advanced serrated lesions

Baseline Characteristics and Longitudinal Outcomes of Traditional Serrated Adenomas: A Cohort Study

Trends in Detection of Adenoma and Sessile Serrated Lesions Over a Decade in a Community-based Healthcare System

Clinicopathological and molecular features of sessile serrated adenomas with dysplasia or carcinoma

Risk factors for serrated polyps: results from a large, multicenter colonoscopy-based study

S237 Disparities in Colon Polyp Prevalence Among Different Racial Groups: A Multi-Racial Study From 2009 to 2023

Clinical, pathological genetics and intratumoral immune milieu of serrated adenocarcinoma of the colon

Discriminating Endoscopic Features of Sessile Serrated Adenoma, Hyperplastic Polyp, and Conventional Adenoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Improving sessile serrated adenoma detection rates with high definition colonoscopy: A retrospective study

[The alternative way of colorectal cancer developing. The histogenetic and molecular features of serrated lesions (review, continued)]

Histology subtypes and polyp size are associated with synchronous colorectal carcinoma of colorectal serrated polyps: a study of 499 serrated polyps.

Prevalence and risk factors for sessile serrated lesions in an average risk colorectal cancer screening population

Long-term Risk of Colorectal Cancer After Removal of Conventional Adenomas and Serrated Polyps

Serrated polyposis syndrome: defining the epidemiology and predicting the risk of dysplasia