Abstract:Background and objective: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most commonly diagnosed cancer and the fourth leading cause of cancer mortality worldwide. Likewise in the Philippines, the prevalence of CRC has shown to be increasing. Colonoscopy, a screening procedure for CRC, has parameters to gauge quality of detection. One of which is the Adenoma Detection Rate (ADR). Higher ADR has been linked to improved cancer detection. This study aimed to determine the ADR and Polyp Detection Rate (PDR) among Gastroenterology practitioners in a tertiary government university hospital in the Philippines, estimate ADR from PDR, and identify factors associated with ADR. Methods: An analytical, cross-sectional study among patients who underwent colonoscopy for the years 2021 and the first half of 2022 at the Central Endoscopy Unit (CENDU) of the Philippine General Hospital. Demographic data of fellows and consultants were collected through an online form, while those from patients were obtained from electronic records. Colonoscopy details and histopathology results were accessed through the hospital's Open Medical Record System (MRS). ADR, PDR, and estimated ADR were computed using established formulas. To evaluate the strength of the relationship between the estimated and actual ADR, Pearson's correlation coefficient was used. Chi-square analysis, Mann-Whitney U test, and Kruskal-Wallis H test were performed to identify the factors that might influence the ADR. A cut-off of p <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: The total computed ADR of consultants and fellows combined is 22%. The difference between the ADRs of Gastroenterology consultants and Fellows-in-Training is statistically significant at 31.6% and 18.7%, respectively (p= 0.017). The total Polyp Detection Rate is 57.6% while the weighted group average Adenoma to Polyp Detection Rate Quotient (APDRQ) is 0.4085 or 40.85%. The estimated ADR has a moderate degree of correlation with the actual ADR when an outlier was excluded (r=0.521 (95% CI, 0.072-0.795, p=0.0266). Significant factors related to ADR include endoscopists' years of practice (p=0.020), number of colonoscopies done (p=0.031), and patient tobacco use (p=0.014). Conclusion: The overall ADR among consultants and fellows is at par with the standard guidelines. A moderate degree of correlation exists between actual and estimated ADR when an outlier is excluded; however, more studies are needed to determine the APDRQ in the wider local setting. Longer years in practice, total number of colonoscopies performed, and patient tobacco use are associated with increased ADR.

S912 The Link Between Trainee Participation in Colonoscopy Procedures and Quality Metrics

Patient and Physician Factors Associated with Adenoma and Sessile Serrated Lesion Detection Rates

Quality Metrics in Surgery Resident Performance of Screening Colonoscopy

Comparison of adenoma detection rate and proximal serrated polyp detection rate and their effect on post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer mortality in screening patients

Trends in Detection of Adenoma and Sessile Serrated Lesions Over a Decade in a Community-based Healthcare System

S332 Prevalence and Clinical Characteristics of Serrated Adenomas at Screening Colonoscopy in Rural Georgians

Is the level of cleanliness using segmental Boston bowel preparation scale associated with a higher adenoma detection rate?

Serrated Polyps at CT Colonography: Prevalence and Characteristics of the Serrated Polyp Spectrum

Improving sessile serrated adenoma detection rates with high definition colonoscopy: A retrospective study

Effect of computer aided detection device on the adenoma detection rate and serrated detection rate among trainee fellows

Impact of a scalable training program on the quality of colonoscopy performance and risk of post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer.

S467 A Retrospective Study Examining the Impact of Computer-Aided Detection on Adenoma Detection Rate Amongst Non-Gastroenterology Endoscopists in a Rural Medical Center

Impact of Fellow Participation During Colonoscopy on Adenoma Detection Rates

Rates of synchronous advanced neoplasia and colorectal cancer in patients with colonic serrated lesions

Is There a Difference in Adenoma Detection Rates According to Indication? An Experience in a Panamanian Colorectal Cancer Screening Program

Semi-supervised Quality Evaluation of Colonoscopy Procedures

Adenoma Detection Rate and Polyp Detection Rate among Gastroenterology Fellows and Consultants in a Tertiary Hospital in the Philippines: A Cross-sectional Study

Detection rates of colorectal neoplasia during colonoscopies and their associated factors in the SCREESCO study

Adenoma detection rate in colonoscopy: how can it be improved?

Current progress on the endoscopic features of colorectal sessile serrated lesions

Detection of Colorectal Serrated Polyps by Stool DNA Testing: Comparison with Fecal Immunochemical Testing for Occult Blood (FIT)