Screening for Patients at Risk of Diabetic Foot Ulceration in a General Diabetic Outpatient Clinic

L. Klenerman,Christopher McCabe,D. Cogley,S. Crerand,PW Laing,M. White
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9136(199606)13:6<561::AID-DIA112>3.0.CO;2-P
IF: 3.5
1996-06-01
Diabetic Medicine
Abstract:An examination of the reproducibility of three tests for identifying patients at risk of diabetic foot complications is reported. One thousand and one patients attending a general diabetic outpatient clinic at the Royal Liverpool University Hospital underwent screening using the Semmes‐Weinstein monofilaments, the biothesiometer, and palpation of pedal pulses. Two hundred and fifty‐nine patients who were found to have a deficit on at least one of these tests were given a second appointment where the tests were repeated. Two hundred and twenty‐nine patients attended for their second appointment. The expected range of variation in readings for the biothesiometer was 5 log hertz, sufficient variation to make the biothesiometer unacceptable as a screening instrument. The range of reproducibility for the four pedal pulses was from 68 % to 81 %, also an unacceptable level of variation. Over 85 % of the results for the Semmes–Weinstein monofilaments were the same on the first and second measurement. Of the three instruments examined in this study, only the Semmes–Weinstein monofilaments have sufficient reproducibility in the clinical setting for them to be recommended for general use as a screening test for risk of diabetic foot complications.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?