Abstract:Background & aims: Serrated lesions are an important contributor to colorectal cancer (CRC), notably in the proximal colon. Findings in the distal colorectum are markers of advanced proximal adenomatous neoplasia. However, it is not known whether they affect the odds of advanced proximal serrated lesions. Methods: We performed a retrospective cross-sectional study of data from 1910 patients (59.3 ± 8.0 years, 53.8% female) who underwent an average-risk screening colonoscopy from August 2005 through April 2012 at Indiana University Hospital and an associated ambulatory surgery center. Colonoscopies were performed by an endoscopist with high rates of detection of adenomas and serrated polyps. Tissue samples of all serrated polyps (hyperplastic, sessile serrated adenoma/polyp [SSA/P], or traditional serrated adenoma) proximal to the sigmoid colon and serrated polyps >5 mm in the rectum or sigmoid colon were reviewed by a gastrointestinal pathologist and reclassified on the basis of World Health Organization criteria. Advanced serrated lesion (ASL) was defined as SSA/P with cytologic dysplasia, SSA/P ≥10 mm, or traditional serrated adenoma. Advanced conventional adenomatous neoplasia (ACN) was defined as tubular adenoma ≥10 mm, villous histology, high-grade dysplasia, or cancer. The prevalence of proximal ASL and ACN was calculated on the basis of distal colorectal findings. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the age-adjusted and sex-adjusted odds of advanced proximal adenomatous and serrated lesions. Secondary analyses were performed to examine the effect of variable ASL definitions. Results: Fifty-two patients (2.7%) had proximal ASL, and 99 (5.2%) had proximal ACN. Of the 52 patients with proximal ASL, 27 (52%) had no distal polyps. Of the 99 patients with proximal ACN, 40 (40%) had no distal polyps. Age and type of distal adenomas were significantly associated with proximal ACN. There were no significant associations between distal polyp type and proximal ASL. In secondary analyses, distal SSA/Ps (P = .008) but not distal hyperplastic polyps or conventional adenomas were associated with any proximal SSA/P. Conclusions: The findings at flexible sigmoidoscopy that traditionally serve as indications for colonoscopy (conventional adenomas) are likely to be ineffective for detection of proximal ASL. This finding, plus the observation that most patients with proximal ASL have no distal polyps, favors screening colonoscopy over sigmoidoscopy, especially in the elderly. The observation that non-advanced distal SSA/Ps are associated with any proximal SSA/P warrants further study.

Rate of detection of serrated lesions at colonoscopy in an average-risk population: a meta-analysis of 129,001 individuals

Detection rates of adenomas, advanced adenomas, and colorectal cancers among the opportunistic colonoscopy screening population: a single-center, retrospective study

Prevalence and risk factors for sessile serrated lesions in an average risk colorectal cancer screening population

Long-term Risk of Colorectal Cancer After Removal of Conventional Adenomas and Serrated Polyps

Serrated polyps and the risk of synchronous colorectal advanced neoplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Findings in the distal colorectum are not associated with proximal advanced serrated lesions

Association between serrated polyps and the risk of synchronous advanced colorectal neoplasia in average-risk individuals

Serrated Polyps at CT Colonography: Prevalence and Characteristics of the Serrated Polyp Spectrum

Detection rates of colorectal neoplasia during colonoscopies and their associated factors in the SCREESCO study

CT-Colonography vs. Colonoscopy for Detection of High-Risk Sessile Serrated Polyps

Rates of synchronous advanced neoplasia and colorectal cancer in patients with colonic serrated lesions

Adenoma detection rate by colonoscopy in real-world population-based studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Reassessment colonoscopy to diagnose serrated polyposis syndrome in a colorectal cancer screening population

Patient and Physician Factors Associated with Adenoma and Sessile Serrated Lesion Detection Rates

Utilization of Colonoscopy and Pathology Reports for Identifying Patients Meeting the World Health Organization Criteria for Serrated Polyposis Syndrome

Comparison of adenoma detection rate and proximal serrated polyp detection rate and their effect on post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer mortality in screening patients

Prevalence of Colorectal Neoplasia in an Average-Risk Chinese Population: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Association between lifestyle and dietary preference factors and conventional adenomas and serrated polyps

Incidence of colorectal cancer at different screening intervals after index colonoscopy and post-polypectomy: a meta-analysis of 811,181 participants

Sessile serrated lesion prevalence and factors associated with their detection: a post-hoc analysis of a multinational randomized controlled trial from Asia

Adherence to Colonoscopy in Cascade Screening of Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis