Abstract:Introduction While many aspects of colonoscopic surveillance program for colorectal cancer (CRC) in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) have evolved, it is unknown how the risk of CRC changed over time.We report data from the largest and longest-running UC surveillance programs in the world, revealing a recent trend in CRC risk.Methods A retrospective chartreview of histologically confirmed extensive UC patients enrolled in long-term surveillance was performed.The primary end point was defined as death, colectomy, withdrawal from surveillance, or the census date (January 1, 2013).We compared per-decade CRC incidence rate (IR) over the last forty years -i.e.first (1973)(1974)(1975)(1976)(1977)(1978)(1979)(1980)(1981)(1982), second (1983-1992), third (1993-2002) and fourth decade (2003)(2004)(2005)(2006)(2007)(2008)(2009)(2010)(2011)(2012).Cancer detected in symptom-driven investigations or surgery prior to the next scheduled surveillance was defined as interval CRC.Results A total of 1,375 patients underwent 8,650 colonoscopies (median, 5 per patient; interquartile range (IQR), 3 -8) during 15,234 patient-years (PY) of follow-up (median, 11 years; IQR, 7 -17).Cancer was detected in 72 patients (5.2% of study population), of which 15 were interval CRC (20.8%).While the overall CRC IR had decreased over the first three decades, there was a non-significant increase in the fourth decade (4.9 per 1,000 PY) compared with the third decade (3.7 per 1,000 PY; Chi-squared, P=0.30), which was attributable to a significant increase in IR of Dukes' A or B cancer in the fourth decade (3.2 per 1,000 PY) compared with the third decade (1.3 per 1,000 PY; P=0.045; figure 1).Likewise, there was an increase in IR of dysplasia (17.7 versus 11.7 per 1,000 PY; P=0.01).The chromoendoscopy, which was introduced in our center since 2002, was superior in detecting dysplasia compared with white-light endoscopy (lesion detection rate, 8.4% (92/1,098) versus 4.0% (175/4,373); Chi-squared, P<0.001).The IR of Dukes' C or disseminated cancer showed a linear decrease over the last four decade (2.5 to 1.4 per 1,000 PY in the first decade to last decade; Pearson's correlation, R= -0.99; P=0.01; figure 1).Furthermore, despite the decrease in colectomy rate for dysplasia (linear regression, R= -0.43; P=0.007), IR of interval CRC showed significant reduction over time (2.5 to 0.4 per 1,000 PY in the first decade to last decade; Pearson's correlation, R= -0.99; P=0.007; figure 2).Conclusion The colonoscopic surveillance is increasingly becoming effective in reducing advanced cancer and interval cancer risks, which maybe attributable to the improving lesion detection rate and subsequent decrease in the rate of false negative examinations.Although decreasing colectomy rate allowed more patients to retain their colon, it may have resulted in increased early cancer risk, highlighting the need for close monitoring of patients with dysplasia managed non-surgically.

Trends in Detection of Adenoma and Sessile Serrated Lesions Over a Decade in a Community-based Healthcare System

Patient and Physician Factors Associated with Adenoma and Sessile Serrated Lesion Detection Rates

S467 A Retrospective Study Examining the Impact of Computer-Aided Detection on Adenoma Detection Rate Amongst Non-Gastroenterology Endoscopists in a Rural Medical Center

Adenoma detection rate by colonoscopy in real-world population-based studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Adenoma Detection Rate and Polyp Detection Rate among Gastroenterology Fellows and Consultants in a Tertiary Hospital in the Philippines: A Cross-sectional Study

Detection rates of colorectal neoplasia during colonoscopies and their associated factors in the SCREESCO study

Is There a Difference in Adenoma Detection Rates According to Indication? An Experience in a Panamanian Colorectal Cancer Screening Program

Impact of a scalable training program on the quality of colonoscopy performance and risk of post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer.

Factors Predicting the Colorectal Adenoma Detection Rate in Colonoscopic Screening of a Chinese Population

Adenoma Detection Rate and Clinical Characteristics Influence Advanced Neoplasia Risk after Colorectal Polypectomy

Factors influencing the detection rates of colonoscopic polyp and adenoma in high-risk population in colorectal cancer screening

Adenoma Detection Rate in Colonoscopy: Does the Participation of a Resident Matter?

The Impact of Computer-aided Detection Technology in Adenoma Detection Rate Among Experienced Endoscopists in the Community Setting

Effect of computer aided detection device on the adenoma detection rate and serrated detection rate among trainee fellows

Detection rates of adenomas, advanced adenomas, and colorectal cancers among the opportunistic colonoscopy screening population: a single-center, retrospective study

Reply to Li et al.

821 Comparison of the Performance of Flexible Sigmoidoscopy Alone and Combined Flexible Sigmoidoscopy and Fecal Immunochemical Test As Colorectal Cancer Screening Tool in 5406 Asymptomatic Chinese Adults

Current sessile serrated lesion incidence: implications for future clinical practice

Sessile serrated lesion prevalence and factors associated with their detection: a post-hoc analysis of a multinational randomized controlled trial from Asia

Patient- and procedure-related factors affecting proximal and distal detection rates for polyps and adenomas: results from 1603 screening colonoscopies

IDDF2022-ABS-0205 Impact of Individual Colonoscopy Quality Scorecards on Adenoma Detection Rates